Class Notes (807,350)
Canada (492,715)
Anthropology (1,560)
ANTC32H3 (11)

ANTC32 – W3.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
Chris Krupa

ANTC32 – W3 - We didn’t do a reading of lecture last week, so we will discuss that today How this defines primitive society - How is something like order maintained? - Pritchard: why are they stateless? o Some people say they hadn’t become that complex yet. It was the degree zero o history. But he rejected that; he said it doesn’t have anything to do with history. He argued that it was because they rejected it. o Anthro wont necessarily be political. It gives rise to particular social rises. It is misfortune rather than a destiny. It frames where we move. The duty to speak - He started the piece by equating speech with power. Why is speech one of the essences of power? o He starts by saying that there are fundamental things we need to realize. The organ of speech is one of the primary speech by the way power is maintained. The pronouncement, sanction, etc. of law. If you are walking in the mall and someone says stop, it makes you stop. The state control over the speech that matters is what actually matters. o Claste loved paradox – speech and power were connected. The chief had monopoly on speech. He says that the one who speaks is often the name. He says this is a duty and obligation – chief must be able to speak well and command-speak and display it. There is paradox. o But the second paradox, no one pays attention to what chief says. Or at least they pretend not to. Even though what he is saying seems very important because he is talking about the way ancestors live. This is precisely the point. Because he command-speaks, he must be ignored. It is to show the equality – chief is the same level as others. By absorbing the speech and being ignored, he refuses anyone to act like a chief. That is the function of chief. o Speech and Nuer – speech is a passive thing. It is opposite of violence. If you keep one person that symbolizes the person that is powerful, you are then cutting the source of violence from the location of power. Violence is located somewhere else. It is not going to be hoarded by anyone. We have chief without violence. That capacity is of social. o If he were to ask this “how is order maintained in society” ***  Comparing chief’s duty and compelling everyone to ignore it. Torture in Primitive societies - What is the connection between writing and power? o Similar thing, it is going to present the law that can be issued and coding it down. Providing evidence. It grounds in the secret power. Writing itself has function of power in political society. - We see the connection between law, speech and writing. The laws take on and we have connection between the sacred and secular. This is what the nation will live upon, as if given with sacred power. You cannot write something and make into law. The idea of writing might have to do with law. That is why he has digression of political value of torture. Torture – to inscribe the law on the body of those who crossed it. Leave a mark on someone that violated to the state capacity to be the bearer of law. This idea of torture is very important that state exists. It is powerful – look what I can do to you. This leaving of mark is act of writing that there is connection with written establishment of power. So what about … -
More Less

Related notes for ANTC32H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.