Class Notes (836,275)
Canada (509,725)
BIOB50H3 (258)
Lecture 9

ecology lecture 9-13

9 Pages
76 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Biological Sciences
Course
BIOB50H3
Professor
Marc Cadotte
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture 9-10 :  A.J Tansley1 expt in competition(1917)2 species of bedstrawG.hercynicum(acidic soils) + G.pumulium(calcareous soils)  Both grown individuallysurvive on both soils, togetherdetermined by soil type on which it is grown  Darwin theory ofstrrugle of existencecompetition limits abundance/distribution of competing species  Inter-specific Competition—>b/w 2 diff species, both harmed as using same resource  Intra-Specific(think Intra-Murals)-competition b/w individuals of same species  Outcome of competitionlimits growth, survival & reproduction of each (competing species)  Resourcesmust be depleted(ie :Food/Water/ Space etc)eg: space limiting resource for corals  TILMAN EXPT19812 species of diatoms(single cell algea, make cell walls of SiO(2)  Grow Alonereached carrying capacity, deplete resource(SiO2)  Grow Together1 drives other to extinction  Syndera(Fig 11.4, blue line)wins competition against other  ReasonEven @Lower conc of resourcespecies can persist(survive Hardship)R*  Schoener(1983)interspecific competitionsstudy 390 speciesmajority show effect of comp in some conditions(76%) and all(57%)  Connel(1983)50% of 215 species found competition important  Hencecompetition important in enviro  Gurevitch(1992)comp had significant effect on species(competitive effects for 93 species)  Exploitation Competitioncompete indirectlyuse of same resource(R-star)eg : Diatoms in the Tilman Expt  Interference CompetitionCompete directlymay fight etc(acorn barnacles)/ Voles excluding voles from preffered competition  Allelopathy(interference comp)individuals release toxins that harm others(plants)  Egcattle avoid spotted knapweed(+ve advantage), plants relase catechin(into soils)reduce germination/growth of native grass  Comp strongest b/w related/similar species  Distant speicesBrown & Davvidson expt(1977)rodents vs ants  Conditions1) Wire meshexclude rodents 2)Insecticides>exclude ants 3)Exclude both 4)Control  Resultw/o rodentsants inc 71%, inc biomass / nos in case of rodents(w/o ants)  In presence of competitionboth species eat less than normal  Connel(1961)examine factors affecting distribution, survival, reproduction of 2 barnacle species  Larva of both overlapped on middle intertidal + upper zones  AdultsCthalamus(top of intertidal zone),Semibalanus(rest of intertidal zone)  Competitionaffects Geographical Distribution  EgNatural Expt on chipmunk species in Southwestern U.S  Patterson(1980,81)living alone occupy broader elevations/habitats(not in presence of predators)  Competitionmay lead to co-existence  Gauss expt(1930)3 species of Parameciumgrow alonereach carrying capacitygrow togetherdrive other to extinction  Co-existence @ lower sizes of poppossibly due to diff resources being used  Competitive EXCLUSION Principle2 species using limiting resource cannot CO- EXIST if used in same way  Similar Ecological niche(with competitior)leads to extinction  Grinnel(1917)defined NICHE(no 2 species occupy same niche)  California (1925)hungarian patridge(competitior) vs California Quaildue to same nichecan go extinct  Diff elevations usednot Extinct, contrary to what was expected  Resource Partiioninguse Limited Resource in diff ways  EG; Schoner(1974)lizard use space in diff ways-less competition  Cyanobacterium competitionboth green/red bac co-exist in white light  Red lightgreen bac excel(red bac reflects) and green light(red excels)  Character Displacement(CD)Due to Natural Selectionchange in morphology of competing species  Eg; Darwin Finchesliving togetherdiff beak sizes(even if diff from optimal size)  W/O Competitionbeak size is intermediate value10mm, changes due to competition  CD examplesdiff morphology of sticklebacks living in same lake  Outcomediff morphology from competitior  less competitiongrow faster  Measured log of growth vs Morphological Index(similiarty of species)--ve correlation-ve index = higher growth  Competition Reversal  due to environmental conditions, species interactions , disturbance  Outcomepredator/prey roles reverse  Eg : Presence of herbivores in (ragwort flea beetles/ ragwort)  Ragwort flea beetles dec ragwort popcompetitior size increases  No Flea beetleragwort-superior competitior  CompetitionEvolutionary Change-alter outcome of competition  Expt : House-Fly vs Blow-Fliesgrow in chambers + same food  Houseflysuperior initially  Over timesituation change houseflies extinct  Conclusion-possibly some evolutionary change  LOTKA-VOLTERRA EQUATIONS : Competitive Exclusion  dN1/dt = r1N1(1- (N1+αN2)/K1  dN2/dt = r2N2(1-(N2 + βN1)/K2 nd  Basciallylogistic for 1 species + abundance of 2  Α,β Competition co-efficientseffect of 1 species on another(constant)..like effect of 2 on 1 (alpha) and vice-versaExtent to which resources by 2 decreases per capita growth of 1  α=1 = effect of species on each other  α<1species 2 weaker competitor  α>1-species 2strong competitior  Theory of Modelcompete for similar reosurcesCompetitive Exclusion  Related casesN1 = 0,N2 = 0, dn/dt0(no change in pop density)  Straight line relationshipsrefer to 0 population growth isoclinestells under which conditions species inc/dec  Isoclines do not crosscompetitive Exclusion  Co-Existence Equationαr/aprey population dec >P < r/apop inc(think that inc P makes the Prey Equation more –ve)  dP/dt = 0N = m/baN> m/ba(inc pop)N< m/ba(dec pop of Predators)  0 population isoclinesPrey/Predator pop cycles  Prey cycle 1 step aheadEg : inc prey popinc predator popdec prey popdec Predator pop (think Physics Wavesone cycle behind..lag by about 45 degrees)  -ve of ModelAmplitude of cycle depends on initial nos of Prey/Predators  Large Ampdrives species to extinction  Extinction realistically rare by predation-because-1)Habitat Complexity 2)Spatial Refuges 3)Prey Switching 4)Prey Respond to Predation 5)Evolution  Pop cycleshard to achieve in labs Huffaker’s expt(1958)predatory mite eats herbivorous 6-spotted miteboth went extinct(prey easy to find)  Hairston Exxptrotifer(predator)Algal (prey)Aschynchrous cycling of population  Predator peakprey low and vice-versa  SynchronousInc / Dec at same timestheoretically Expected  Reasons for asynchronous1)Algea evolve (to face predation) 2)Accumulation of toxins(alter algeal physiology) 3)Algal Nutritional Quality inc with Nitrogen Concentrations 4)Rotifer Egg Viability inc with Prey Density  Yoshide(2003)test hypothesisOnly mathematical model including evolution in prey was right in prey-predator model(proved hypothesis 4)  Outocome single genotype algea(no evolution)synchronous cycles  Multiple GenotypesAsynchronous cycles  Algeal Genotypes Ω Poor competitiors in their community(trade-off)  High Predator popΩ genotype(algea) inc, predators dec  Low Predator Ω genotype(algea) outcompetedreplaced by other genotypespredator inc  Lynx / Snowshoe Hare Cyclessynchronous pop cycles  @High Density of hareLow reproductive Rate  Possible Reasons1) High Hare densityFood limited (although some are declining even with food)  2)Predation by lynx + other predators  Questions1)Hare birth rate drop during decline phase of cycle  2) Nos rebound slowly when predators low  3)Low hare nosphyscial conditions of hares worsen  Krebs Expt1*1 km strips 4 plots1) control 2) + Food 3)- predator 4) + food/- predator Survival Rates/densities of hares monitored for 8 years  Highest in + food/ - predator  Mathemtatical Model support field Expt(King and Schaffer 2001)  Lynx Movement from Low to High prey abundance=>Geographic Synchrony (hare cycles)  + Food/- Predators cyclefences did not remove other predators like birds of prey  Stress caused by fear of predator attack  Decling condition in D
More Less

Related notes for BIOB50H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit