Class Notes (905,556)
CA (538,426)
UTSC (32,636)
POLC71H3 (52)
Ryan Hurl (1)
Lecture

POLB71 Essay Questions.doc

3 Pages
149 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POLC71H3
Professor
Ryan Hurl

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Try to make an argument, taking on a perspective and taking on a
question.
Quick intro with thesis have it be a directional statement
1 2 3 main points and a conclusion
Questions:
1) Imagine that you have been asked to write a book (anonmusiosly)
in England in 1640, while Charles I is still king, trying to persuade
the people trying to oppose the monarchy and overthrow the
king. What will you say? What exactly is wrong with having a kin
who looks over his people as a father looks over his children.
Make sure that your essay is crafted to appeal to a 17th century
audience, which means that most people have been taught to
believe the divine right of kings. Your argument should point out
the main flaws in these arguments as you make the case for
rebellion.
(Lec 2 notes will be helpful, (jan 18th reading week about university
of oxford reading), elements in the Baxter and Williams, parts of
hooker and Baxter about consent and legitimacy, misery and remedy,
agreement of the people and Putney) deal with it in detail and
criticize, grappling with divine right of king, we know from levelers
that legitimacy is impossible so the king should go.
2) If the purpose of government is to make the best life possible for
its citizens why should a gov’t tolerate beliefs (religious or
morale) that it considers to be inimical (unfavourbale) to be living
a good life? Isn’t freedom of conscious just another way of
allowing evil to flourish? Consider in particular the arguments
that Baxter and Williams make on either side of this
disagreement/ who makes the more cogent argument?
-Baxter and Williams readings, hookers readings may help, the
homiley would support Baxter.
3) The diggers (winstabley), levelers (rainsborough) and Grandees
(ireton) all agree on this: property is important to how society
operates. They agree on little else. What exactly is the relationship

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Try to make an argument, taking on a perspective and taking on a question. Quick intro with thesis have it be a directional statement 1 2 3 main points and a conclusion Questions: 1) Imagine that you have been asked to write a book (anonmusiosly) in England in 1640, while Charles I is still king, trying to persuade the people trying to oppose the monarchy and overthrow the king. What will you say? What exactly is wrong with having a kin who looks over his people as a father looks over his children. Make sure that your essay is crafted to appeal to a 17 century audience, which means that most people have been taught to believe the divine right of kings. Your argument should point out the main flaws in these arguments as you make the case for rebellion. (Lec 2 notes will be helpful, (jan 18 reading week about university of oxford reading), elements in the Baxter and Williams, parts of hooker and Baxter about consent and legitimacy, misery and remedy, agreement of the people and Putney) deal with it in detail and criticize, grappling with divine right of king, we know from levelers that legitimacy is impossible so the king should go. 2) If the purpose of government is to make the best life possible for its citizens why should a gov’t tolerate beliefs (religious or morale) that it considers to be inimical (unfavourbale) to be living a good life? Isn’t freedom of conscious just another way of allowing evil to flourish? Consider in particular the arguments that Baxter and Williams make on either side of this disagreement/ who makes the more cogent argument? -Baxter and Williams readings, hookers readings may help, the homiley would support Baxter. 3) The diggers (winstabley), levelers (rainsborough) and Grandees (ireton) all agree on this: property is important to how society operates. They agree on little else. What exactly is the relationship between government and property? Should everyone have a say in ruling, or should only those with a fixed permanent interest get a vote? Perhaps more importantly, is property a natural right or something that is merely a product of a particular civil constitution? Should it be help in common by all the citizens, or is
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit