Class Notes (839,561)
Canada (511,396)
Psychology (7,818)
PSYB10H3 (544)
Lecture

socialpsychlecture10.rtf

12 Pages
88 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYB10H3
Professor
Elizabeth Page- Gould

This preview shows pages 1,2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 12 pages of the document.
Description
-1Lecture 10:Aggressive & Prosocial Behaviour Aggression: intentional behaviour aimed at causing physical or psychological pain Two dimensions of classification: Type of pain: Physical pain: aggression inflicting physical pain Verbal or relational aggression: saying or doing psychologically hurtful things Goal of pain: à we make distinction between hostile and instrumental aggression à what is the goal of aggression? HostileAggression: Stems from feelings of anger Has the goal of inflicting pain InstrumentalAggression: à inflicts pain à the pain is a middle step toward another goal (starting spreading rumors because they were jealous of your social status. Example: saying you are promiscuous) Approaches toAggression: Think about a time you hurt someone. Why did you do it? Typical answers: “born this way” - genetic predisposition “the booze made me do it” - chemical influence “I was having a bad day” - frustration-aggression theory “I did what anyone else would do” or “violence in the media” - social learning theory Genetic Predisposition: à basic theoretical premise: - aggression is adaptive and has survival value à Earliest evidence: -Animals can be bred for aggression - twin studies find highly heritability for aggression Amygdala: à Stimulating amydala can lead to aggression Depends on context: sometimes leads to withdrawal/fear. Relative social status matters. Pre-frontal Cortex: à may be regulator of aggressive impluses - generally involved in planning and behavioral regulation Evidence: Murderers have less PFC activity than normal controls - PFC becomes less activated when contemplating aggressive act Testosterone: à the steroid hormone testosterone may increase aggression -- greater exposure to testosterone in womb linked to aggression BUT: - injecting testosterone does not increase aggression - testosterone-aggression is weak effect. R=14 Seratonin: à Neurotransmitter related to many aspects of experience - may inhibit aggressive impluses: - violent criminals have less serotonin than normals - serotonin antagonists (blockers) increase aggression Chemical Influence:Alcohol à alcohol distributes behaviour in general - reduced self-consciousness à deindividualation - reduced attention to consequences of action Relationship between alcohol and aggression: à 65% homicides, 55% of domestic violence - assailant and or victim had been drinking In lab studies comparing alcohol with placebo: People give stronger shocks. -- report more anger when thinking about conflict with romantic partner Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Aggression stems from frustration Frustration: à the perception that you have been prevented from attaining a goal Factors affecting frustration and aggression: More aggression when: - you are close to the goal - frustration is unexpected, intentional, or unjustified - can’t retaliate against cause of frustration Critiques of frustration-aggression hypothesis: à Not all aggression is the result of frustration: - environmental factors - neo-associationism Not all frustration leads to aggression Environment andAggression: à Pain - rat attack each other after being shocked - participants blast each other with louder noise after hand submerged in ice water VS room temperature water à Heat above 32 degrees invokes aggressions Neo-Associationism: àAversive events: - cause anger - concepts associated with anger become accessible - anger-related concepts already in working memory especially facilitated à Aggressive stimuli: trigger aggressive behaviour - object associated with aggression [gun, knife] STUDY:Aggressive Stimuli: The Gun Study -Method: 1. Participant works with confederate on problem solving task involving shocks 2.Anger manipulated by shocks from C (low anger= 1 shock. High anger = 2) 3. Next, P can shock C 4. Beside the shock machine was either: - nothing - gun - badminton racket Results: High anger - gun high Social Learning Theory: Vicarious Learning: à Learning solely through observation of other people’s reinforced and punished behaviour à no direct reinforcement or punishment à aka “social modeling” Social modeling of aggression: à we learn aggression from observing others and imitating them à adoption of modeled behaviours are dependent on rewards and punishments observed STUDY: bobo doll experiment Bandura: Method: 1. Kids watch video tape of young adult behaving aggressively or neutrally toward a “Bobo doll” 2. Model’s consequence: - rewarded, punished, or not 3. Kids incentive: incentive or no incentive Implications: à family influence - physically aggressive children more likely to have physically punitive parents - 30% of physically abused kids abuse their own kids à media influence - high publicized suicide - increased suicides Television andAggression: By 7 grade, average child has seen: - 8,000 muders - 100 000 other acts of violence - More television predicts aggressiveness - Important caveat: mostly correlation studies Television & Aggression Over time: STUDY: Eron & Huesmann Method: 1. Recruited 200 eight year old boys from new york city 2. Measured general aggressiveness at age 8 3. Documented how much violent TV they watched RESULTS: - violent TV watching at age 8 predicted: - aggression at age 9 - criminal acts of violence (rape, robberies, assault) at age 30 - controlled for aggression at age 8 Moderating Factors in TV-Aggression Link: à Model similarity - makes us want to act like them if they are similar to us à Punishment VS Reward àApparent reality - cartoons aggression less than film à apparent consequences - modeling more likely when pain/harm caused by violence is not depicted How Does TVAffectAggression? à Imparts information about how to aggress à Primes anger (neo-associatism) à makes world seem more dangerous, increases fear of victimization à heavy viewers tend to overestimate frequency of violent crime, probability of being assaulted à Loosens inhibitions toward violence Prosocial Behaviour: Co-operative Dilemmas: à Situations where the most beneficial action for an individual will be harmful for the collective dilemma Escalation of conflict: à interpersonal conflict feels itself and escalates if one side foes not begin concession Close relationship example: Stimulus: partnerAcomes home and snaps at partner B Partner B response: An equally hurtful remark - partner B is vindicated, but partnerAfeels compelled to respond with an equally vehement remark à conflict escalates Adefusing remark: à partner B takes a hit in pride, but partnerAAhas no reason to say another hurtful remark -- conflict defuses International Relations: Stimulus: CountryAaccidentally bombs a civilian area of country B during a training exercise Country B’s response: à bomb them back - country B is vindicated, but they are not at war with CountryA àAccept apology - country B takes a hit in many ways, but they maintain peaceful relations with countryA Tragedy of the Commons: àAco-operative dilemma that occurs in situations where everyone has access to a common pool of goods that will replenish itself if used in moderation but disappear if overused à People reliability tend to take more than their fair share Ex: mash patatoes at thanksgiving. They didn’t mean to take it. Pizza is easy Why do we take more than our fair share? àAnchoring andAdjustment heuristic - desired share is used as an anchor - do not sufficiently adjust down à Size of commons is not readily estimable When do we take our fair share? à Both the size of the commons and the group that is sharing it are easily determined à The size of an equal share is explicitly stated The Prisoner’s Dilemma: àAsituation where two people make a collectively-dependent decision without knowing the other person’s decision àAspecial case of John Nash’s Game Theory à strategies that maximize personal outcomes in multi-stage prisoners dilemmas: Best Strategy: simple tit for tat strategy -- co-operate on first round -- then mirror opponents response - defect as soon as opponent defects - continue defecting until they cooperate, then cooperate If you know when game is about to end: -- defect on last trail Prosocial Behaviour: àAction performed with the goal of benefiting another person Altruism: à Helping done purely out of a desire to help another person - does not benefit the self - may even involve a cost to the self Examples: Anne Herbert coined the phrase: “RandomActs of Kindness” - i
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1,2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit