Class Notes (834,049)
Canada (508,296)
Psychology (7,771)
PSYC14H3 (187)
Sisi Tran (66)
Lecture

Lec 2.docx

3 Pages
57 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC14H3
Professor
Sisi Tran
Semester
Fall

Description
September 12, 2013 PSYC14- Evolutionary Foundations of Cultural Psychology  Evolution = innate & Culture = Learned  Do they go hand-in-hand?  Contrasting elements?  Nature = replication of genes & nurture = replication of ideas (in the cultural psych point of view)  Biological genes = similar to cultural ideas o Needs to be transmittable  Longetvity  popular ideas get picked up  Fecundity  accuracy  Fidelity  needs to be replicated - Anytime an idea is transferred it gets morphed, just like diseases (epidemiology: study of diseases) 1) Communicable ideas spread o Can be communicated easily (i.e technology enables easy communication) o Ex. Having an unacceptable thought (doesn’t get communicated) because it’s socially unacceptable  Talking about periods in some cultures 2) Emotional ideas spread o Rumours occur because you make it more exaggerated, more emotionally relevant (more “gossipy”)  most interesting 3) Minimally Counterintuitive ideas spread o Legends/fairytales o Mostly logical, but something exra that stands out (ex: tangled, hair that glows) - Hunter-gathers: small groups, nomadic, high mortality, 10-30 people in a group, most activities are in highly social contexts etc o Adapt to functions as a group (inter-dependent) o Oxytocin helps mom and infants bond - Homosapiens – capacity for language/ share ideas/ possibility for learning - Domestication of animals and plants = Monumental!! o Industrial evolution o Crop growing, farming communities, using animals for transport/ food/ labor o Farming communities- more food therefore no longer nomadic  Now more time on their hands because of the food surplus  Therefore, began trading with other communities for more products  Also began developing priests and other important figures and activities in community - Hunter-gatherers vs Farming Communities - Standard of living  daily caloric intake, life expectancy, literary rates - Quality of life (personal/subjective) o Haves vs. have nots September 12, 2013 - Farming communities  EVERYTHING shifted (at a price) o Is it really a good thing?  Probably, led us to civilizations - Today, we have it all, not fighting to live anymore (in fact, higher suicidal rates) o Consumer society o Community now- we don’t know everyone  Learning to interact with strangers  Progressively less time spent with nuclear family - Standard of libing = $/ status/ respect - Quality =  ?  ? - EEA  E
More Less

Related notes for PSYC14H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit