Class Notes (837,539)
Canada (510,303)
Anthropology (1,678)
ANT100Y1 (964)
Lecture

ANT347 Lecture 2.pdf

2 Pages
130 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Anthropology
Course
ANT100Y1
Professor
Sharon Kelly
Semester
Winter

Description
Presentation: London (England) + Istanbul (Turkey) Lecture 2 January-14-14 12:12 PM Reminders: - Jan 24 (fri) last day to hand in proposals - Proposals due next Tues - Download revised syllabus - suggested readings have changed - Readings on BB will be removed soon - download now! - March 4 - Singapore presentation - 2 textbooks available (one in short term loan, or online) Urban Anthropology - Some Thoughts on Methods - Article from 70s - Urban anthropology emerged from 60s for first time - Urbanization and anthropology changed a little bit - A lot of anthropology is taken in urban cities by defaulty - people continue to move into cities - Rural becoming urbanized - UN predicts 70% of the world population living in cities - Anthropological research in cities - Labor migration * important reason migration to cities - Participant observation, qualitative methods - Other types of social science methods - such as quantitative methods (surveys, questionaires, interviews..etc) - Fear that if anthropology had to incorporate other social science disciplines … they fear that they would lose the methodology that is specific to anthropology - City = domain of sociology for a long time - Anthropologists typically western / British / American tradition ○ Start to do research at home at this time ○ Domain of sociology for a long time ○ Tendency to study exotic and rural - Urban continuum was a big theme - how people adapt to life in the city, what is diff, what remains the same - Ideology beliefs, work, income, - Looking at process of urbanization - Typology (i.e Setha Low) of cities ○ 60s - 70s, anthropologists concerned with categorizing the city ○ Industrial city, administrative city ○ Things of more relevance at the time - Anthropologists bound their research topics Common Units of Analysis (Eames & Goode, 1977) ○ Units based on common residence (people living in a specific neighborhood / community) ○ Groups based on common culture of origin (people of same ethnicity/ cultural background) ○ Groups based on common belief systems (e.g. religion/ specific church, politics /political party..) ○ Groups based on common work (e.g. people working in the same labor / factory/ industry..etc) ○ Units based on primary relationships (e.g. share same kinship / social networks / relationship) - A lot of these still hold true today how we bound our research - Another trend: ○ Heavily influenced by Chicago School ○ Built on work by sociologists - Social relationships within the city, spatial relationships (how relationships are shaped and formed in the city) - 70s and 80s ○ People moved away from processes of urbanization and urban adaptation ○ Started looking at social phenomenas that may not necessarily be related to the city ○ Any context ○ The city = became a locus rather than a focus, anthropology IN the city rather than anthropology OF the city ○ Less focus on how theses people interacted and how they lived, it was more on narrowing, looking at the groups,
More Less

Related notes for ANT100Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit