.pf{position:relative;background-color:#fff;overflow:hidden;margin:0;border:0}.pc{position:absolute;border:0;padding:0;margin:0;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;overflow:hidden;display:block;transform-origin:0 0;-ms-transform-origin:0 0;-webkit-transform-origin:0 0}.bi{position:absolute;border:0;margin:0}.c{position:absolute;border:0;padding:0;margin:0;overflow:hidden;display:block}.t{position:absolute;white-space:pre;font-size:1px;transform-origin:0 100%;-ms-transform-origin:0 100%;-webkit-transform-origin:0 100%;unicode-bidi:bidi-override;-moz-font-feature-settings:"liga" 0}.t:after{content:''}.t:before{content:'';display:inline-block}.pi{display:none}@media screen{.pf{margin:13px auto;box-shadow:1px 1px 3px 1px #333;border-collapse:separate}}.ff1{font-family:ff1;line-height:.689453;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;visibility:visible}.m0{transform:matrix(.320260,0,0,.320260,0,0);-ms-transform:matrix(.320260,0,0,.320260,0,0);-webkit-transform:matrix(.320260,0,0,.320260,0,0)}.ls0{letter-spacing:0}.sc0{text-shadow:-.015em 0 transparent,0 .015em transparent,.015em 0 transparent,0 -.015em transparent}@media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0){.sc0{-webkit-text-stroke:.015em transparent;text-shadow:none}}.ws0{word-spacing:0}.fc0{color:#000}.fs0{font-size:48px}.y0{bottom:0}.y1{bottom:11.529374px}.y2{bottom:896.831579px}.h2{height:32.4375px}.h1{height:991.526171px}.h0{height:1014.58492px}.w1{width:760.93869px}.w0{width:783.997438px}.x0{left:0}.x1{left:11.529374px}.x2{left:80.55174px}

EEB330H1 Lecture 13: Lecture 13.pdf

Autonyms don"t have the author"s name in the title because they"re all unique. Aigeiros dubb: this instantly made it so that the entire family was, populus l. sect. In botanic nomenclature you have something like: populus detoides marsh. Ectienw: ectienw is the author, ait. is in parenthesis because it"s the alternative name that someone else came up with is by this author. For things under genus, you have to have the generic name as part of the combination: and you have to have connecting terms that tell you what it is (ex. sect. , etc. ) For things below level of species, you have to have both epithets. Below the level of species, you wouldn"t have to put down subspecies (species is important part) 

Canada

Systematic Botany

Ecology & Evolutionary Biology

James Eckenwalder

University of Toronto St. George

<p><p>Explain why you made the choice to go to your economics course lecture in terms of marginal benefits and marginal costs.<br></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top;"></td> <td style="vertical-align:top;">The marginal benefit of going to the lecture (passing the inevitable quiz) was less than the marginal cost of going (missing an hour of leisure time).</td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top;"></td> <td style="vertical-align:top;">The marginal cost of not going to the lecture (failing the inevitable quiz) was less than the marginal benefit of not going (the hour of leisure time).</td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top;"></td> <td style="vertical-align:top;">The marginal cost of not going to the lecture (failing the inevitable quiz) was greater than the marginal cost of going (missing an hour of leisure time).</td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top;"></td> <td style="vertical-align:top;">The marginal benefit of going to the lecture (passing the inevitable quiz) was greater than the marginal cost of going (missing an hour of leisure time).<br> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table></p>

<div></div> <p>in our online lecture we include a quote by E. O. Wilson,</p>

<p><p>Why is such a seemingly complicated scheme used for LacZ complementation (X-gal colour selection and Î±-peptide complementation), in which most of the lacZ gene is in the host chromosome and the small Î±-peptide resides in the cloning vector? In other words, why not have the entire lacZ gene in the vector? Give two reasons. [3 marks] [Clue: From the relevant lectures and the Lab Manual, based on colour selection (Lecture 4) and the sizes of recombinants (Lecture 5)]</p></p>

EEB330H1 Lecture 13: Lecture 13.pdf

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

EEB330H1 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Symmetry In Biology, Floral Symmetry, Monophyly

EEB330H1 Lecture Notes - Systematic Botany, Folk Taxonomy, Lexeme

EEB330H1 Lecture Notes - Systematic Botany, Clusiaceae, Apiaceae

Related Questions

	The marginal benefit of going to the lecture (passing the inevitable quiz) was less than the marginal cost of going (missing an hour of leisure time).
	The marginal cost of not going to the lecture (failing the inevitable quiz) was less than the marginal benefit of not going (the hour of leisure time).
	The marginal cost of not going to the lecture (failing the inevitable quiz) was greater than the marginal cost of going (missing an hour of leisure time).
	The marginal benefit of going to the lecture (passing the inevitable quiz) was greater than the marginal cost of going (missing an hour of leisure time).