ENG328Y1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 37: Judith Butler, Felix Culpa, Jean-Paul Sartre

45 views2 pages
11 May 2018
School
Department
Course
The Bell (Cont.)
Untested goodness is better than tested sin
James is not interested in consequences or ends or ethical self-fashioning,
he's simply interested in the rules
Thoroughly anti-Christian
Approach is anti-consequentialist
Absolutist ethics
No felix culpa - fortunate/happy fall
Fall of Adam and Eve
§
Allows us to create our moral selves
§
Gives knowledge of good and evil
§
Phenomenology of agency is missing for him
Complexity of ethics bypassed by James
"I cannot agree with Milton… virtue, innocence should be valued
whatever its history…how false it is to tell our young people to value
experience…"
Pg. 153 - giving Michael an invigorating sense of possibility
Toby looking up to him
Gaze of the other doesn’t have to be reductive and destructive
It can be liberating
But Michael doesn't feel like he has to confront himself
Sartre - empty flight of the transcendence - feeling like you can deny certain
Toby finding out about Michael's homosexuality is his fortunate fall
He looks to himself to find unconscious impulses
Male panic in the face of sexuality
Found himself looking at Michael curiously protective
Deepening Toby's feeling
Michael hasn't dealt with his feelings towards Nick at all
Fear that Nick might have seen
Did not want Nick to think he preferred a younger man
Didn't want Nick to think him unfaithful
Clearly hasn't severed himself from the relationship
Not even thinking about the damage inflicted on Toby
Sexuality as a kind of performativity rather than an essence - Judith Butler
High modernist novels didn't have passages like this that had discussion of
characters' ideas
Monological discourse that reflects Murdoch's view of sexuality
Dora talking about the effect of the picture of her
Using philosophical terms, solipsism
No conjunction about authorial intervention
No feeling of appealing to memetic voice
Michael inclines to this abstract language, so less of a problem with him
Difficult to maintain
Dora is capable of moral and spiritual growth in a way that other
characters are not
Noel Spens represents the atheistic perspective
Resolutely secular perspective
No need for transcendence
Not even Dora's aesthetic transcendence
Sartre would argue that there is much more facticity and necessity in our lives
that we think
Michael incapable of embracing facticity
Thinks all desire can be transcendent
His sermon is an exercise in self-deception
But doesn’t negate the validity of some of the ideas he presents
Feels he has totally destroyed Toby's peace of mind
Totally misreading him
§
Portrayed as somewhat enriched by the moral complexity
§
Possible to be both a sexual opportunist and spiritual leader
§
Goodness is meaningless without choice
Michael's interpretation of the bell is different from James
To and fro of subjectivity
We must work from inside outwards
James thinks it is the incarnation of the virtues of Catholic folly
2:11 PM
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers