Class Notes (839,394)
Canada (511,324)
Geography (975)
GGR341H1 (5)
Lecture 4

GGR341 Lecture 4.docx

5 Pages
109 Views

Department
Geography
Course Code
GGR341H1
Professor
Robert Lewis

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
GGR341 Latin America Lecture 4, Jan 27th RECAP from last week Monocrop for export – e.g. sugar Forms of land tenure – mita – forms of tribute – distinct in Inka - a day of labour to mining, slave labour force Cattle, estidienta – large cattle? Neocolonialism ?? vs (colonialism) – monroe doctrine – policies for international affairs – to justify interventionism – political imposition - rights were monopolized in colonial period by espenior – political autonomy gained in neocolonialism – social class, working class except children (look into lecture notes more) – countries had their independence – however, intervened politically by the US or UK – economic foreign investment taking over resources – little development , enclaves, less benefits taking place in country Eras of economic development 1. Modern/Liberal period (1880s-1930s) 2. Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) (1940s-1970s) 3. Neoliberalism (1980s-today) 4. Post-liberalism The modern/liberal period - How is infrastructure going to be built? - Ideology that embraced in the period – free market Export-Led Model (1880s-1930s) - Banana, industries - Little economic development - Open to direct foreign investment - Little quality jobs - Mining - Uneven circumstances – countries with resources vs without, - Paraguay, Bolivia – no access to the sea - Created dependency on other countries such as the US Neo-colonialism 1. US and UK multinationals acquired large extensions of land at bargain prices i.e., United fruit Company 2. Corruption to avoid taxes and duties; political intervention to safeguard US interest (CIA in Guatemala) – local elites involved to get benefits from companies 3. Internal markets were irrelevant to multinationals 4. Promoted highly uneven development patterns 5. Workers had almost no rights – no labour regulation, can impose any rights on workers People go through state violence – mass Critique: The imperialist-neocolonial relationship - Unequal relationship – market dominated by monopolies - Raw materials are dominated by companies - Imperialist profit - Foreign direct investment: concessions of loans Economic crisis - Dependency made LAC vulnerable to global events - Drop in foreign exchange - Capacity to buy imports decreased 2. Import Substitution Industrialization (1940s-1970s) Dependent capitalist development
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit