Class Notes (839,095)
Canada (511,185)
History (3,264)
HIS109Y1 (536)
Lecture

Feudalism and the Three Orders of Medieval Society

5 Pages
103 Views

Department
History
Course Code
HIS109Y1
Professor
Kenneth Bartlett

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
Feudalism & the Three Orders of Medieval Society – September 17, 2013 History: - study/analysis of change over time - looking for the cause of change End of the Roman Empire Leads to a Fragmented Europe: - roman laws were removed; right and wrong were no longer codified and applied equally to all areas of the empire. Laws were determined locally - common monetary system was removed; value was no longer standard - the world became much more local; roads were no longer maintained Cities: the hub of trade and civilization: - With the end of the Roman Empire; cities began to decline - The decay/collapse of Roman Empire meant that security was up to the individual. Some people were capable of protecting themselves while others began to associate with the people who could protect them, often for a cost. With such, the traditions of the Roman Empire began to change: In the time of the Roman Republic, patron lords like senators and other powerful people would have large posses of individuals willing to do things for them. This could be any number of errands that the lord felt to important to do. Originally, having these people at your beck and call was a sign of power and status but when the Roman legal and military systems began to fail and the Roman Empire became increasingly dangerous, the errand runners began to hang around the lord’s house as his own private army. In return, the workers got protection for their own land and for their family. As the cities declined, the wealthy retired to the countryside because it was more secure and had steady access to food. They brought their armies with them and would fortify their country houses to be secure against invaders. * foundation for feudalism: select groups of people who would work, support, fight and die for a powerful man who owned land, and in return, be protected. This new developing system links with the invasions of Barbarian Tribes who began infiltrating the former Roman Empire from over the Alps. The tribes brought their own means of social and military organization with them. In Barbarian tribes, comitatus were the similar comparison to the private armies of the elite from the Roman Empire. These comitatus were the most experienced warriors and would be on permanent retainer to the tribal chieftain and his personal guard. In return, they would get special privileges over others in the tribe. These tribes eventually started to settle down and ceased to be nomads. Because there was no central authority, powerful individuals would exercise power over large groups of people. Lots of military connections. RESPONSE TO NECESSITY! Systems like this are only efficient when everyone buys into them. This system developed over many years and was finally built up by the end of the 8th century, early 9th century. Around the time of this new system, there was a great technological development that changed the social system of war. It was the stirrup on the saddle of the horse. This enabled people to fight while riding. Before, if you were holding yourself onto your horse with your knees, you couldn’t do anything else. - Invented in either Mongolia or china and brought west via barbarian tribes. The right to fight on horseback was reserved for the most effective comitatus (for tribes) or the most violent thugs (for Roman estates), since upkeep of horses and training of soldiers was very expensive. These men were the most trusted of the landlord or chieftain, and quickly became the only privileged military class. Originally referred as "chivalry" (from french for horse). This trust meant that the powerful leader could arm and train his private armies without fear that they would turn against him. British referred to them as knights. They had personal relationships with their landlords. Knights were not the romanticized version from movies, but were medieval "biker gangs." They had no sense of nobility but got what they wanted thorough violence and brute force. Knights did not ride race horses but rather clydesdales because the armor was so heavy they needed massive and strong horses to support them. This combination of armor and height (large horse) while fighting meant that there was no one that could stand against you even the best trained foot soldiers. Not all warriors were equal. The ones who had close relationships with their landlords were given the privilege of fighting on horse back. In order to keep power over the knights, the landlords bought their allegiance by giving them land. This land was called a fief and allowed the knight to live in leisure and train. The land was supposed to be the exact right amount to support one knight. At this time, land was not given to hereditary descendants when a knight died. The knights son would have to make the same commitment to fight for the landlord to
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit