Class Notes (838,386)
Canada (510,872)
History (3,264)
HIS351Y1 (19)
Lecture

HIS351Y1 Lecture 1 Fall 2011.docx

7 Pages
58 Views
Unlock Document

Department
History
Course
HIS351Y1
Professor
Jerzy Borzocki
Semester
Fall

Description
Jerzy Borzocki SS 3111 Mon 2-3 [email protected] Auri Berg Pipes, a Concise History of the RMS Reisin 1900-17 Suny the Sov. Experiement 1900=1944  books not available yet Mid year test 25% Paper 20% - minimum 6 sources Proposal 5% -- Thesis for paper End of year ex 25% Book reviews 25% Syllabus posted on course website Lecture Russia 1900’s * A society that was rather strange, there were two major forces struggling for change and for the status quo  then there were the peasants o more or less, they were for the status quo o hard, however – to want change you need to have a concept for it , the peasants did not o One concrete change the peasants would agree upon is that they all wanted land  Background – up until 1861 ½ of all of the peasants had been serfs in serfdom o Define serf:  Not a slave no market for them  Rather they were purchased with the land.  in 1861 the tsar free’d all of the serfs. o They now were not tied to soil o However the serfs were not entirely free, o Traditionally, in serfdom, the serfs had their own portion of land for their own needs, and they we divide their time between their owners land and their own  The peasant after 1861 now had to be paid for his work  The land that the peasants tilled, now belongs to all of the peasants, known as village commons or peasant common o This land was managed by the village council, and so each family got a piece of the action  Head of household was always most senior father  Head of the household o Power had no bounds, you want to live in the house you have to obey the head – absolute power o Within the household, no private property – “mine doesn’t exist” o Members of the household then, had no concept or grasp of personal rights o New households could not be founded until the head of household would die, then the sons would divide up the property amongst themselves.  The Village council o Consisted only of heads of households o Males only o They ran the whole city o The village council had supreme authority in the village, you did what they said. o They were also mediators, or a court of justice Village Taxes  State charged the village a certain amount of money  Village council decided what house would pay what Abolishment of Serfdom  one would assume that man could move as he pleases  however, he is still stuck under the rule of the village council  man cannot even leave the village without permission o the village has to pay taxes o if people wanted to leave, that means the taxes owed would be greater on those who remained in the village o additionally if people left the village they would lose their claim to land o Village council was also responsible for things like community service – taking care of the poor and sick  Each household was entitled to it’s own piece of land  Every 12-15 years, the land (village commons) would be re-partitioned. o Needed to correct things like death o The larger the household the larger the land  Encouraged households to have as many children as possible.  Lead to an explosive population increase by 50% from 1861 to 1900. In 1900 you have a situation now where the peasants are hungry.  population has doubled however the land has not  to peasants land was viewed just like hour or water, something that was necessity of life and that could not be owned.  Lead to the unified idea that it was a travesty that the landlords were aloud to own such large portions of land – UNJUST o The peasants want a piece of the land owned by the nobility Nobility Land in relation to peasants  peasant could lease land, on his own from the nobility for a fee  Many young males tried to escape this cycle, and left the village commons to work in the factories in the cities  Cycling started to happen as a result of this, also due to Russia’s cold climate o 6 months working in factories in the city o 6 months working in the village  This lead to many families leaving the village , because they would lose this land during the six month absence  It also lead to seasonal work only In 1861 when the serfs were free, they received a mortgage they had to pay off for 49 years.  The peasants however do not have the money to pay the land lords  So the state pay the landlords for the peasants in bonds  now the village has to pay back the state. – over 49 years peasants believe that someday the tsar will take the land from the landlords  therefore tsar is good, the gentry is bad  in 1905-1906 the village council would tell the peasants to vote for a certain party  and the peasants would listen  this went for changing faith and joining sects and such as well Overall there is not a lot of freedom for peasants who live in the village to have a mind or status of their own. Further Status Quo Autocrat – Tsar  his word is law, he can change it at will  meaning he can do whatever he wants  up until 1862 – the tsar not only ruled the country but he also owned it  Gentry would serve the Tsar and the serfs would serve the Gentry  Tsar<<
More Less

Related notes for HIS351Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit