Class Notes (836,562)
Canada (509,854)
POL200Y1 (263)

POL200 March 14, 2013.doc

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Political Science
Erin Black

POL200 March 14, 2013 Chapter 18 The transfer of right, a covenant is made with the sovereign and another cannot be made to follow another. Once they gave their power to a sovereign, it cannot be taken back without the sovereign's permission. A covenant with God cannot undo the sovereign's power either. It is unjust to believe that a pact with God supersedes that of a sovereign. The sovereign is the high priest, because he controls religious practice. There is no free religious practice in Leviathan. The state has to control the doctrine in all books before they're published. Hobbes emphasizes that the sovereign cannot be punished because justice and justice derive purely by the sovereign's will. He was authorized by the people and the font of law, he is not beholden to the people. These ideas are very illiberal. There is no possibility of appealing to any bill or constitutional rights; ie religious freedom, no freedom of speech. The rights begin and end at the sovereign's will. But by virtue of the contract's making and natural right, the citizens can always appeal to a notion of self- preservation: that first and foremost, people are allowed to defend themselves from physical attack, even if the sovereign commands to have you executed. On the one hand, an illiberal outlook with a strong state authority. But there is also an idea of individual rights, to resist the power of the state. Hobbes' Illiberalism He takes a stand on free speech and believes in censorship if it does in the name of political stability. But freedom of conscience is encouraged. The sovereign can punish the children of pride, ambitious people. The desire for honour and glory among certain political elite poses a political problem, but the sovereign has the power to make and unmake titles, and it is with this that the sovereign controls these elements in society. Hobbes does not envision a heartless dictatorship. Cruelty is against the laws of nature. Cruelty and other acts of oppression is bad for the sovereign, it weakens his position (as well as the nation, as well). Recommends charity, punishment towards correction of the criminal rather than revenge (promoting leniency where possible), tax on the rich. Civil society, as long as peace is maintained, is better than the state of war -- the state of nature. It's in the strength and vigour of the people that the sovereign has success. Political difficulties arise not because of self-indulgence or corruption of the sovereign but that the people are driven by self-interest and driven by their passions. The sovereign's limitations on his own self-indulgence will contribute towards the glory and well-being of his state which will be good to him. What if the ruler is not a good ruler and doesn't listen to Hobbes' recommendations? His state will be a progressively weak state and it will be taken over. Hobbes has very little to say about international relations. His view stems from how he believes the state of nature exists. Obedience of the people Why should they obey the sovereign and his laws? A community flourishes because the people obey him. To disobey the sovereign means to contradict himself. Lawbreaking give rise to a fundamental contradiction. He rationally made a promise to escape the state of
More Less

Related notes for POL200Y1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.