Class Notes (834,664)
Canada (508,678)
POL305Y1 (56)
Lecture

2012-10-22_Lecture#6-Democratic Break down and Military Dictatorships.docx

4 Pages
69 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL305Y1
Professor
Roberta Rice
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture#6-Democratic Break down and Military Dictatorships i) Break down and Populist democracy ii) Brazil: Setting the Trend iii) Chile: Tu Allende Tragedy iv) Will the Military Return to Power? 1) Break down and Populist Democracy  PopulismTrade unions, peasants demanding inclusion into economic and political system. Growing radicals in the 1960s and the Cuban Revolution. (1930s-1960s)  The democratically elected presidents fell to military coups and these regimes had a particular characteristic that was similar to one another: Characteristics of Military Regimes of 1960s and 1970s  Blamed the poor state of their countries on their politicians (blamed corruption and incompetence on politicians)  And saw them as a better alternative, they wanted to run country directly, banned media/parties, and took an administrative role. (run the country better)  These institutions were quite distinct as they worked with business class, protest against authority  Places emphasis on loyalty, authority and stability.  Military leaders at the time prioritized national security and were preoccupied with internal subversion. o CIA worked with them, Latin American officers were trained in the School of Americas.  CIA provided technology and knowledge of surveillance etc… o The school of Americas was an American institution used for training military officers. (located at Georgia)  On military technique  Manuals on effective torture and repressing groups.  Taught sophisticated torture techniques: pain barrier etc… o The Western Hemisphere institute for Security Cooperation (WHISC)  Systematic use of repression against civilians including widespread use of torture, assassinations and disappearances. o In Chile, a thousand of supporters were kidnapped and disappeared. o Argentina had a lot of people killed, thrown from helicopters to the sea.  Big theoretical concept: Bureaucratic Authoritarianism o Esp. in South America and more well off country o It is a form of institutional, technocratic, military rule that seeks to curtail popular mobilization and is built on a political coalition and policy orientation that entails strong ties to transnational capital.  Brazil, Argentina, Chile (economically advanced countries adopted this) o Counteracts against Modernization theory- o The more advanced the countries are, the Latin American countries became MORE dictatorial instead of more democratic  Guillermo O’Donnell (author of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism) o Maintain elite domination, Transitional corporations over economy o popular sectors excluded from decision making through repression o Often forged in alliance with multinational corporations  Cheap loans from international sources, invest in flashy projects like infrastructure to modernize countries. 2) The Breakdown of Populist Democracies Factors leading to Democratic Breakdown:  Breakdown of consensus among political elites o For democracy to function ,leaders must compromise and following the riles of the game But these leaders in LA did not follow these two rules in ISI policies. o Moderate leaders of the left, were much more revolutionary after cuba in 1960s. Moderate on the right felt pressure on extreme right that was fearful of cuan case. o Extreme left and right pressuring politicians stuck in the middle and they all look to the military for them to help them sqush the other side.  Abuse of authority by incumbent governments  Abuse democratic process by a disloyal opposition o Not all opposition to democratic government are loyal. Several democratically elected groups were challenged by guerilla groups. o Leftist government such as Guatamla had opposition to overthrown it o In chila, it was 1973 where the opposition goes to extreme for a military coup.  Polorization of social class. o Class enemies: elites vs. Populisit/ worker class o Urban unrest: all of this frightens capitalist class  Frustration with the pace of change through constitutional/democratic procedures. o Esp. when you are a leftist government, you are caught in between two groups: those who want to speed up revolution (radical left/right) and opposition ntha t wants to stop the rate of change for revolution. o Risk alienating loyal opposition (whether they spped or slow down their revolution) o Either way, the other side, would look at the outside factor such as military to stop this  E
More Less

Related notes for POL305Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit