Class Notes (838,807)
Canada (511,107)
POL345Y1 (25)
Lecture

POL345Y1Y.FEB142012.SP.docx

8 Pages
119 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL345Y1
Professor
Emanuel Adler
Semester
Winter

Description
POL345.FEB 14 2012.SP On Feb 20th, there will be a meeting about regional issues On March 6 2 meeting. Also same date paper is due. The second date, March 6 may be postponed to the next week. Debate consist of 3 students each taking one position. Positions  Iron wall. The land belongs to Israeli’s. Raise a tall wall  Two state solution  Bi-national state/ state of all its citizens Each role taker must be an advocate. Even if you don’t believe in it. Pros and cons are mentioned but conclude that your position is the best choice. Debate on notion of time.  Who do you think will believe that time will solve the problems, Palestinians or Arab.  Cause Jewish to lose state, colonialism disappears etc. Volunteers are to take each of three positions. Debate and include class participation. Students  Victor took iron wall  Ax took 2 state solutions  John took bi-national state What do we mean by Israeli state? Do we include Palestinians? Majority of Palestinians feel they are not included. The re-definition of Israeli is required to include Palestine. Israelis minority is subservient. Swapping land and people. Statistically Arab doesn’t want to move. Leavening settlers in west bank. Moving Arabs to the state of Palestine. Majority of Israeli liberals, reject facing out Jewish state + Jewish nature.  Call for making Israeli Palestinians apart of us, we. Equality sharing, laws, changing some symbols.  Arabs could serve in national service and not IBF. Receive same rights. Class exercise Questions asked for debate. What lessen do you extract from lessen of two cities? Student: elite one on hill was built was used to stand against one on Nazareth. Show they want to have a presence that they are biggest. A large Jewish presence. Also build on higher elevation for defence verses neighbour Arab cities. This difference reflects the inequality no matter on paper how many laws were passed for equality. Formally Arabs are supposed to have equal right. But the Jewish community is much larger, more wealthy which emphasis the differences. Batley present government to change structure of Supreme Court so Supreme Court will be more favourable to discriminated. #2 question Should Israeli Palestinian be part of moral community? Student: Yes need a say to be part of the state identity Can they be part of the us without being part of the moral community? Very Jew people make argument professor makes. Ynesism brings colonizing Israeli must have constriction, bill of rights. Those inscribe, write in stone. Do you think power sharing is a viable positional alternate for Israelis and Palestine?  Arab is part of element, but not government.  Can count support on the Arab Student: Demographic not stable, population not stable. Arab Members are in parliament but then when it fell, it made dramatic change. Student: Both Switzerland and Belgium were made states were made for balance power. Israel is not stable on the power topic, so they can’t officially share power. Professor: if 150 years from now, if they think they are going to win, then they are going to wait. Each side won’t reconcile each other as a we. Israeli democracy and identity. Problem is Israel is Jewish and democratic. What is the political system? Democracy part of nation identity (another factor) Democratic because of the structure? Citizens see it part of their identity. Debate: Is Israel What we are also who we are.  People give different answers on democracy depending on who they are, who they think they are.  Charter, culture, laws, identity, state founded by 1 nation can be democratic while neglecting the 20% minority. Core religious? Part of land? Democratic? main reasons con Israel not a democratic identity 1. Sizable Arab minority living in Jewish state  Jewishness of state, Jew religion, holiday  Occupation of Arab territory because believe they are Israel’s land. 2. Religious party became more aggressive on state, theocratic state. Demanded more anti-liberal measures. Israeli can be both Jewish and democratic only if. Other paths. Democracy - + Jewish state - authoritarian Democratic bi-national theocracy Reformed Jewish state + Background history Is it natural that Israel becomes a democratic state?  Zionism use democratic institution is allocating state.  Zionism dependant on ruler, Great Britain, and then U.S to get help. Procedural democracy. Democracy has not made its way from political institute to political identity.  Because most Jews came from Russia, Iraq, countries who didn’t know liberal beliefs. Historically Jews did not come from Canada, us  1992 Russian Jews came, referred activism as wrong. The mentality that activism is wrong. European democracy was alien to Israeli  Early Israeli was socialist, Marx, all zionese were nationalist. These ideas overrides concerns for minorities, what mattered were the state. Zion was collective force, no attention for individuals. What do individuals do for collective not what the collective does for the individuals.  Jewish religion rejects privatization of regions, separate of state and religion  Minority created civic and political right; reality state was created by Jews for the Jews.  Inspite of wars, state remain democratic, stayed democratic after pressure from hostile neighbour.  Israeli doesn’t have attributes of a formal democracy.  Israel has committed h
More Less

Related notes for POL345Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit