Class Notes (808,087)
Canada (493,058)
Biology (6,677)

Ecology 20.docx

11 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Biology 2483A
Mark Moscicki

Ecology-Lecture 20 Nov 19, 2013 Introduction  Various biomes show a wide array of diversity when it comes to the animals that live there.  In terms of ecological functioning, these animals are linked by their feeding interactions, rather than their physical appearances or taxonomic relationships. The ecological roles of organisms are determined by their trophic interactions—what they eat and what eats them. This determines the influence of an organism on the movement of energy and nutrients through an ecosystem Energy Flow & Food Webs  Trophic levels describe the feeding positions of groups of organisms in ecosystems.  Each feeding category, or trophic level is based on the number of feeding steps by which it is separated from autotrophs.  The first trophic level consists of autotrophs who generate chemical energy from sunlight or dead inorganic matter in an ecosystem. The second level consists of herbivores who feed on autotroph biomass. This category also includes detrivores that consume dead organic matter. The remaining trophic levels contain carnivores that consume animals at the trophic level below them (primary and secondary carnivores). Most ecosystems have four or fewer trophic levels.  Omnivores (foxes) defy our attempt at grouping organisms into simple feeding categories. However, their diets can be partitioned to reflect how much energy they consume within each trophic level. This partitioning is facilitated via the use of stable isotopes. "We are all going to be dirt in the ground"  All organisms are either consumed by other organisms or enter the pool of dead organic matter (detritus). In terrestrial ecosystems, only a small portion of the biomass is consumed, and most of the energy flow passes through the detritus. The image to the right shows that more than 50% of NPP ends up as detritus.  Dead organisms and feces are consumed by organisms called detritivores (primarily bacteria and fungi), in a process called decomposition.  Detritus is considered part of the first trophic level (autotrophs), and detritivores are part of the second level (herbivores).  Much of the detritus in streams, lakes, and estuaries is derived from terrestrial organic matter. These external energy inputs are called allochthonous inputs. These outputs include plant leaves, stems, wood, and dissolved organic matter that fall in from adjacent terrain or flow in via ground water. Allochthonous inputs can be very important in stream ecosystems (up to 99.8%). However, they are not very important in lake and marine ecosystems. Although important, this energy is lower quality due to the chemical composition of the carbon entering the system (amount used is actually lower than input indicates).  Energy produced by autotrophs within the system is autochthonous energy (detritus in terrestrial ecosystems comes from plants). The importance of autochthonous energy inputs increases from the headwaters toward the lower reaches of a river. This is because water velocity decreases, and nutrient concentrations increase as you go downstream. Energy Flow Among Trophic Levels Energy/Biomass Pyramids  The amount of energy transferred from one trophic level to the next depends on food quality and consumer abundance and physiology.  The second law of thermodynamics states that during any transfer of energy, some is dispersed and becomes unuseable: Energy will decrease with each trophic level. For example, autotrophs lose chemical energy through cellular respiration, lowering the amount of energy available to the second trophic level.  A trophic pyramid portrays the relative amounts of energy or biomass of each trophic level stacked from lowest to highest. They are made up of a set of rectangles (each of which represents the amount of energy or biomass within one trophic level). These pyramids show us how energy flows through the ecosystem. Some of the biomass at each level is not consumed, and some of the energy is dispersed in the transfer to the next level. Therefore, the size of the energy rectangles decreases as we move from one trophic level to the one above it.  In terrestrial ecosystems, energy (biomass production) and biomass(total amount of living or organic matter) pyramids are similar because biomass is closely associated with energy production.  In aquatic ecosystems, the biomass pyramid may be inverted relative to the energy pyramid. This is because the primary producers are phytoplankton which have short life spans, and high consumption rates by primary consumers. In other words, the biomass of heterotrophs may be greater at any time than the biomass of autotrophs. However, the energy produced by autotrophs is still greater than that produced by heterotrophs.  Inverted biomass pyramids are more common where productivity is lowest, such as nutrient- poor regions of the open ocean. This is because the phytoplankton in the open ocean have a higher turnover rate than the phytoplankton in more nutrient rich waters (lakes) Thus, phytoplankton in nutrient poor regions provide a greater energy supply per unit of time. Energy Flow Differs Among Ecosystems  It is reasonable to assume that the flow of energy to higher trophic levels is associated with the amount of NPP at the base of the food web. However, other factors come into play (proportion of each level consumed by the one above, nutritional content of primary producer, efficacy of energy transfers)  To better understand energy flow between trophic levels, a comparison of the proportions of autotroph biomass consumed in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems was looked at.  Herbivores on land consume a much lower proportion of autotroph biomass than herbivores in most aquatic ecosystems.  On average, about 13% of terrestrial NPP is consumed; in aquatic ecosystems, an average of 35% NPP is consumed.  There is a positive relationship between net primary production and amount of biomass consumed by herbivores. This suggests that herbivore production is limited by the amount of food available.  If herbivore production is limited by the amount of available food, it makes sense that the proportion of autotroph biomass that terrestrial herbivores consume could increase if they consumed more of the available biomass. Several hypotheses have been proposed that explain the lower proportion of autotroph biomass consumed in terrestrial ecosystems. 1. Herbivores are constrained by predators, and never reach carrying capacity. Predator removal experiments support this hypothesis in some ecosystems 2. Autotrophs have defenses against herbivory, such as secondary compounds, spines, etc. Plants of resource-poor terrestrial environments tend to have stronger defenses than plants from resource-rich terrestrial environments. 3. Phytoplankton are more nutritious for herbivores than terrestrial plants. Terrestrial plants have structural components such wood, which have few nutrients. Freshwater phytoplankton have carbon:nutrient ratios closer to those of herbivores than to those of terrestrial plants. Efficiency of Energy Transfer  Not all of the energy consumed by a heterotroph gets incorporated into heterotroph biomass. Energy efficiency (output of energy per unit of energy input) is used to describe energy transfer between trophic levels.  Trophic efficiency: Amount of energy at one trophic level divided by the amount of energy at the trophic level immediately below it. Trophic efficiency incorporates three types of efficiency:  Proportion of available energy that is consumed (consumption efficiency). Consumption efficiency is higher in aquatic ecosystems than in terrestrial ecosystems. Consumption efficiencies also tend to be higher for carnivores than for herbivores.  Proportion of ingested food that is assimilated by digestion (assimilation efficiency). Once ingested, energy must be assimilated by the digestive system before it can be used to produce new biomass. Assimilation efficiency is determined by food quality. Food quality of plants and detritus is low because of complex compounds such as cellulose, lignins, and humic acids that are not easily digested, and low concentrations of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. Animals have carbon:nutrient ratios similar to the animals consuming them. Assimilation efficiencies of herbivores and detritivores are 20%–50%; carnivores are about 80%. Digestive capacity of consumers is associated with their thermal physiology. Endotherms (generate own heat) digest food more completely than ectotherms (rely on heat exchange with environment) and thus have higher assimilation efficiencies. Some herbivores have mutualistic symbionts that help them digest cellulose.  Ruminants (cattle, deer, camels) have a modified foregut with bacteria and protists that break down cellulose. They have higher assimilation efficiencies than other herbivores.  Proportion of assimilated food that goes into new consumer biomass in the form of consumer growth or reproduction (production efficiency). A small portion must be used for respiration associated maintenance, as well as construction of new biomass. Production efficiency is strongly related to the thermal physiology and size of the consumer. Endotherms allocate more energy to heat production, and have less for growth and reproduction than ectotherms. Thus, ectotherms have higher production efficiencies. Body size in endotherms is an important determinant of heat loss, and thus production efficiency. Body size affects heat loss in endotherms. As body size increases, the surface area-to-volume ratio decreases. A small endotherm (e.g., a shrew), loses a greater proportion of its heat across its body surface than a large endotherm, such as a grizzly bear, and will have lower production efficiency.  Biomass not ingested or assimilated enters the pool of detritus Trophic Efficiences Influence Population Dynamics  Changes in food quantity or quality impact trophic efficiency and can determine consumer population size that can be sustained (and health of individuals in consumer populations).  A study was done to examine the effects of changes in food quality on Steller Sea Lion populations.  Steller sea lion populations in Alaska declined by about 80% over 25 years.  They found that individual sea lions collected during the period of decline were smaller than individuals within the same age classes collected before the start of the decline. There was also a reduction in the number of pups born per female, which resulted in a shift of the age structure toward older individuals. Smal
More Less

Related notes for Biology 2483A

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.