Law 2101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Tire
27 Dec 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Courts will not enter adequacy of consideration. Promised nephew 5k if his nephew didn"t drink, smoke, gamble, swear until he was. Told i will give you 5k but died before he paid it. Executor refused to pay on basis that there was no consideration for uncle"s promise. Nephew gave up liberty to do these thing on strength of his uncle"s promise. Tobias v dick and t eaton co. T had exlcusive right to sell d"s products in prarie provinces. T was not successful and d allowed e to sellits products in the prarie provinces. T sued d for breach of contract, d said there was no contract. T had not promised something in return - one sided. Not contract - courts, no contract to sue on. Under agreement, wood had exclusive right to use d-g nam of clothing design. In return, d-g got 50% of wood"s profit. Thomas-consideration involves something coming from the promisee.
