Class Notes (807,718)
Canada (492,825)
Philosophy (1,278)

Class 4 Answers.docx

2 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Philosophy 2080
James Hildebrand

Class 4 Answers QUESTIONS: 1. What is the ceiling for non-pecuniary losses set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Andrews v Grand & Toy? At the time of this case, the Supreme Court set the ceiling at $100,000.00. You should be aware that this is much lower than decisions in the United States. The bulk of what seemed to be the huge damages award in this case was costs of future care, and replacement of lost income. In Ontario damages for non-pecuniary loss are generally awarded under the Family Law Act for a loss of care and companionship, and are much lower than this $100,000.00 ceiling. Recall from the case that prior to this decision, a damages award in a case like Andrews would be $10,000.00 or less. As you have likely guessed, the courts have been willing to adjust this ceiling each year in accordance with the rising cost of living, so inflation-adjusted this ceiling is over $200,000.00 now. I haven’t looked up the actual number, you are welcome to try and find this out. 2. In the same case, describe the test used to determine non-pecuniary losses. The functional approach is used: where the court recognizes that money cannot restore or provide happiness, but, as the only choice we have in a law suit like this, it can provide the plaintiff with some “solace” or comfort. 3. What did the Alberta Court of Appeal say about the plaintiff wanting to live in a home of his own? Lots of things really. They said it was an unreasonable request. They said he picked it because it was the most expensive option. They said that he might just as easily pick to go and live in the Bahamas. They said that a plaintiff could not be compensated for every conceivable injury. They said that the expense to the defendant should be considered in awarding damages. They said he could live in a hospital, and that might even be free. They said he should live with his mother, that is what other people do. They said he might take his damages award and squander it. They also said that living in a home
More Less

Related notes for Philosophy 2080

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.