Philosophy 2080 Lecture 15: Philosophy 2080 - Lecture 15

88 views7 pages

Document Summary

In an attempt to prevent smith driving away with stolen goods, a policeman jumped onto. Smith proceeded to drive erratically, shaking the policeman off and causing death. The judge directed the jury to find that smith had the necessary intent to cause gbh murder if they were satisfied that the reasonable man could have foreseen the harm as a consequence. The house of lords affirmed that the virtual certainty test was an objective test. This case has since been overruled by r v nedrick [1986] and r v woolin [1999]: the virtual certainty test now contains both subjective and objective elements. Intend a. : certainty to also cause b. ) (side effect, normally important reason against b. , do a. ) anyway. Culpable for your intention even though you didn"t really want that to happen. I didn"t mean to harm the officer i just wanted to get away. The jury thought that he honestly didn"t realize the likelihood of harm.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers