DH200 Lecture 4: How Technologies Impact Humanistic Studies
Document Summary
How technological have impacted how humanistic studies are undertaken. As noted in last class, developments in dh inevitably affected how work was done. In particular, research could become faster and more efficient: changed how research plans are formulated, digital catalogues and sources aid searching and access (cid:858)(cid:373)a(cid:396)ki(cid:374)g up(cid:859) la(cid:374)guages p(cid:396)o(cid:448)ide (cid:373)o(cid:396)e i(cid:374)fo(cid:396)(cid:373)atio(cid:374) a(cid:271)out sou(cid:396)(cid:272)es. Too fast: obvious pros and cons, pros, many of these tools are efficient, work faster than people are capable of doing. Insightful, allow you to manipulate information; was a difficult job in the past: cons. All this allowed traditional work to be done with new tools. Ho(cid:449)e(cid:448)e(cid:396), the(cid:396)e a(cid:396)e also (cid:373)o(cid:396)e (cid:858)(cid:396)adi(cid:272)al(cid:859) (cid:449)ays i(cid:374) (cid:449)hi(cid:272)h dh has (cid:272)ha(cid:374)ged ho(cid:449) thi(cid:374)gs a(cid:396)e done. Collaboration: how do we picture stereotypical humanities scholar, stereotypes as scholars being lone workers, social media, cloud sharing, shared access, similarly aggregation, allows new approaches and scope for research. Dissemination: digital versions of print publications, web-based approaches.