Class Notes (839,195)
Canada (511,223)
York University (35,583)
MODR 1730 (79)
Lecture 9

Lecture Nine: Fallacies Part Three

3 Pages
156 Views

Department
Modes Of Reasoning
Course Code
MODR 1730
Professor
Philip Mac Ewen

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
Lecture Nine: Fallacies Part Three November 16, 2011 Fallacy Eleven: Appeal to Authority Definition: This fallacy is committed when there is an appeal to an illegitimate authority. When an appeal to authority does not meet the following conditions, it is considered to be a faulty appeal to authority and therefore is a fallacy. - There must be an identifiable field of knowledge - The person appealed to must be an authority in that particular field - The person appealed to must have current knowledge of information in that field - There must be a general consensus among other experts in that field about the given topic - The authority must be specifically stated - The authority must not be in a conflict of interest Example “Linus Pauling, a double Nobel prize winning chemist has argued that mega doses of Vitamin C will increase a person’s lifespan. Surely if such a noted scientist like this makes that claim then it must be true” This is a fallacious argument because it violates more than one of the required criteria for a successful appeal to authority. - The person appealed to is not an authority in the field, which is medicine - Therefore this person may not be up to date on all medical discoveries (although it is possible that they are) - There is no indication that there is a general consensus about this argument In some cases, all the requirements may be met but not explicitly stated. This is a difficult fallacy to detect because you have to determine what the implicit claims are as well to determine whether or not the argument is fallacious. Fallacy Twelve: Hasty Generalization Definition: This fallacy is committed when a claim is made by not following the appropriate guidelines for a valid generalization. Usually this occurs when a claim is based on too small of a sample, a sample that is not representative of the population, or when a generalization is made beyond the limits of the population. Example “Last night on my walk, I saw three swans. All of them were white. Therefore all swans must be white” This is a hasty generalization because there were only three swans observed as the entire sample group. Also, only one area was surveyed (it is possible that in other places the swans are differently colored). It also did not specify at what stage of life, although we can assume implicitly that the arguer is talking about fully grown swans. To fix this, you need to find a larger sample group. The larger the sample, the more accurate the information you derive from these observations. Fallacy Thirteen: False Cause Definition: This fallacy is committed when a person fails to establish all the condi
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit