MODR 1730 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Immanuel Kant, Categorical Imperative, Personal Pronoun

52 views2 pages

apricotguinea-pig157

17 Nov 2018

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Lecture: emmanuel kant, he has a principle of ethics, concept of a person, kant said people are unique in the universe. The nature of a person is something very different than anything else in the world. He puts a great value/emphasis on persons: persons are an end onto themselves and never a means to an end. If lying cannot be a general rule and it doesn"t serve the general will, that means we should not do it. He says that it must be about our duty in the moment: he says we do not only have a duty to others, but we should encourage good will in ourselves, ex. You cannot universalize it because it would destroy fidelity and the institution of marriage. It is not based on laws or opinions, but it is based on these principles: right: behaviour that is morally good or correct, language of rights, natural rights, the right to freedom of movement, action and self-determination.

Related Questions

Which person best represents Kantian deontology?

		Susie refused the take Jimmy's life because to kill him would be to treat Jimmy purely as an instrument or object to whatever end she was trying to achieve.
		Susie refused to take Jimmy's life, even in self defense, because in her religion it is considered a sin for which she will be punished by her god.
		Susie refused to take Jimmy's life because if all people were to take the lives of others the world would be chaos.
		Susie refused to take Jimmy's life because doing so would make her a vicious person.

According to Kant's theory, being capable of acting morally means you have dignity and to have dignity means you are priceless. Things and persons who lack this capacity, lack moral worth.

True

False

According to Kant's theory, there are certain actions, such as lying, that we are never permitted to do regardless of the affects of those actions on others.

True

False

What gives humans value for Kant?

Being valued by others.

Having the capacity to reason.

Having capacity to love others.

Acting morally.

All are important components in Kantâs theory except for which of the following:

The motive from which we perform our actions.

The universalizability of actions.

The consequences of our actions.

Recognizing the dignity of humanity.

To properly apply the original (universal law) formula of the Categorical Imperative (Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should be become a universal law, we should take do which of the following:

Ask ourselves "Would I want this done to me?"

Ask ourselves "If all rational beings were to do this action, would there be negative consequences."

Ask ourselves "Would I want my action to become one that all rational beings should follow?"

Ask ourselves "If all rational beings were to follow this action, would it create a logical contradiction?"

If we were to apply the Humanity Formulation of the Categorical Imperative, we would:

		Ask ourselves, "What would be the consequences of such an action on humanity?"
		Ask ourselves, "Is my action recognizing my dignity and the dignity of others or is it treating myself or others as a mere object?
		Ask ourselves, "Do I want to place a value on human life?"
		Ask oursleves, "Will treating myself or others in this way make me a moral person?"

MODR 1730 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Immanuel Kant, Categorical Imperative, Personal Pronoun

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

MODR 1730 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Kanzi, Draize Test, Cruelty To Animals

MODR 1730 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Harm Principle, Twenty Bucks

MODR 1730 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Immanuel Kant, Universal Rule

Related Questions