NATS 1840 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Junk Science, Environmental Science
Document Summary
Peer review has become the scholarly gold standard, so anything in the peer review literature is considered more reliable and authoritative than articles and other sources. Results that are presented as scientifically valid, but fail to conform to normal scientific standards and/or partially true. Selectivity (results picked to support a priority flavoured view) Scientific misinformation can show unwarranted fear and mistrust with serious consequences. System and models: (cid:862)a set of (cid:272)o(cid:373)po(cid:374)e(cid:374)ts that fu(cid:374)(cid:272)tio(cid:374) a(cid:374)d i(cid:374)tera(cid:272)t(cid:863) (cid:272)o(cid:374)(cid:374)e(cid:272)tio(cid:374)s (cid:271)et(cid:449)ee(cid:374) those (cid:862)thi(cid:374)g(cid:863) is a(cid:374) esse(cid:374)tial part of the syste(cid:373) Models of systems allow us to refine our understanding and make predictions.