Class Notes (806,622)
Canada (492,356)
York University (33,488)
Social Science (2,973)
SOSC 1200 (9)

SOSC 1200. Lecture # 7 - Policy Instruments and Staples Theory. Nov 12, 2012.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

York University
Social Science
SOSC 1200
Terry Conlin

Monday, November 12, 2012 Lecture # 7 – Policy Instruments & Staples Theory SOSC 1200 – Canadian Problems Terry Conlin Policy Instruments & Staples Theory: A. 1.) Public Policy & Fundamental Values: - Every Old Fool Likes Eating Apples Daily: o Efficiency: The utilization of scarce resources. o Openness: How, why, and on what basis decisions are made. Levels of input and participation in the decision making process. o Fairness: Procedures. How “things” are done. o Equality: Impartiality before the law, a level playing field, same rules for all. o Liberty: Freedom. The absence of coercion. o Equity: The distributions of actions and reactions. o Accountability: Are decisions markers acting in the common good? Are they responsible for their actions? o (Informed) Decision making: Are the decisions being made in a matter which are educated and informed? - 1984, Brian Mulroney becomes the Prime Minister of Canada and the Progressive Conservative party takes government with a vast majority. - The “Economic Council of Canada” is asked to prepare a report regarding “the burden of government regulation on the private sector and how it needs to be dramatically reduced”. (What values should represent the priorities of the government?). - Each of these values is viewed differently depending on the ideological lenses in which you view it through. o Centre/Right Ideology:  Efficiency: Getting the most for the least. Involves leaving things to the market to handle.  Openness: Both the private and public sector should have the involvement of stake/share holders (not everyone). To be too open invites rewarding your competitors.  Fairness: Same rules for everyone (Ex. Affirmative action creates inequality).  Liberty: The absence of coercion. Freedom “from”, not freedom “to”. Negative definition.  Equity: Low priority. Market will reward talent and punish lack of effort (economic whip).  Accountability: Limited to stake holders and share holders, not the public in general.  Decision making: Should be done in a rational manner, driven by experts in a formal decision making manner. o Centre/Left Ideology:  Efficiency: Improve rates of resource development with sustainability. The improvement of human skills and “meaningful employment” (aka. intensive efficiency)  Openness: Involves an emphasis on inclusiveness the decision making process. The decision maker should be open to use all (citizens).  Fairness: A need to even out a lack of fairness in the past. Removing advantages that created discrepancy historically (Ex. Affirmative action).  Liberty: The freedom “to”. Positive definition.  Equity: High priority. Some distributions have been created through inequality and need to be addressed.  Accountability: Firms must be accountable beyond return of investments. Governments must be accountable because of the ever expanding notion of the “common good”  Decision making: Those impacted by the decision (not just shareholders and stake holders) should be involved in the decision making process. 2.) Legitimate Coercion & Behavior: - Legitimate Coercion: Legal intrusiveness. The ability for government to force a person to do something that they may not want to do. - Major changes in the government post WW2 (Keynesianism, a broader sense of citizenship (social)) - Canadian citizens have entitlements (A line in which they are not allowed to fall below). - This notion has fallen under attack due to Keynesianism falling into disrepute (wasted money, causing lower class to stagnate) leading an ideological shift (defect reduction over government spending, tax reform towards efficiency rather than equity). - Deregulation over regulation (making government policy more efficient by removing the “red tape”). - Privatization over government ran businesses (seen as unfair competition for small businesses). - Governing Instruments: The major methods by which government seeks to ensure compliance, support, and implementation of public policy for the purpose of sustaining or altering human behavior over time (Doern and Fidd). 1.) Are they means? Or are they ends? They are both in themselves as they are ideologically loaded. 2.) May not be directed completely at solving a problem (altering behavior) but for financial means in terms of purpose. 3.) These methods seek to “ensure compliance and support”. If citizens do not like it, they may avoid it. If they don’t like certain tax policies, instances of tax evasion may rise. 4.) The instance of “coercion” leads to cast government in a negative light. o Some refer to “Government instruments “as “Policy instruments”. It means the same thing. 3.) Death & Taxes: A Case Study: - Smoking was deemed as a personal issue, and not a public problem for a time. - Over time, this changed and then required government intervention. - Self regulation is the preferred option, but it does not a
More Less

Related notes for SOSC 1200

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.