PSYC 351 Lecture Notes - Shooting Of Amadou Diallo, Fundamental Attribution Error, Extraversion And Introversion

6 views6 pages
16 May 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Chapter 3
Social Beliefs & Judgement
Perceiving and Processing Social Information
Prejudgments can bias our perceptions, interpretations, and later recall
o Can determine how we interact with others, ourselves, or interpret others
o We often make accurate mental shortcuts about our social world
o Prejudgments can be conscious as we choose to construe our world the way we want
o Prejudgments can be unconscious, and we do not realize what is influencing us
Interpreting Events
Asked extent coverage was biased, if at all?
o Most participants felt the media was fair
o Of those that did not think the media was fair:
o Most thought it was against their preferred candidate
What fuels our biases and ideas?
Stereotypes: schemas applied to social groups, such as a fraternity, gender, or race
o Amadou Diallo
Amadou Diallo as an unarmed African American
Shot 19 times by four police officers who fired a total of 41 shots
Diallo was reaching into his back pocket when police opened fire.
Would the officers have given Diallo more time to show whether he was
dangerous if he was white? Probably not
o Eos ade i shootig gae
Video gae: task is to shoot taget if holding a weapon. Do’t shoot if holdig
something else.
given .5 second to choose
½ targets white, ½ black; ½ holding weapons, ½ not
Which schemas are applied?
Accessibility: Extent to which schemas and concepts are at the forefront of the mind and thus
likely to be used in making judgments
Relevant, act on appropriate circumstance
o Chronic accessibility
o Temporary accessibility: Priming
The Doald “tudies: depending on the list of words you were first asked to study, would
determine how you perceived Donald (whether positive or negative)
Participants were told that they were doing two unrelated experiments
First: identify colors while memorizing a list of words*
“eod: ead a paagaph ad gie ipessios of a peso Doald
Is he someone that is:
stuck-up and reckless
likeable and enjoys new challenges
½ participants had positive words in first study adetuous, self-confident, independent,
persistent
½ had egatie ods i fist study ekless, oeited, aloof, stuo
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Accessible and applicable
Excuse me, but what about actual behavior?
Subjects unscrambled neutral, polite, or rude words
Told to find the experimenter when finished
Experimenter in hall, immersed in conversation for 10 minutes
o Would they interrupt?
o Those with the rude words would interrupt the conversation
Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing
Do we seek information objectively, or are we inclined to confirm the suspicions we
already have? We tend to go along with the beliefs we already hold
Hold on to past beliefs when first meeting someone
Interview Study
Interview this person
o he is somewhat of an extrovert/introvert
o Participants made up different questions that lead to confirmation of original ideas
Most powerful: both the participants and those blind to the study observed the primed
condition
o Easy to confirm that the person is introverted or extroverted etc.
Do we always do this?
o Less likely if:
We are uncertain of our impression
Concerned with the accuracy of their impressions
It is easy to form beliefs and hard to break them
o E.g.: political voting behavior
Belief Perseverance
The tendency to maintain a belief even after it has been discredited
Automatically deny and reject any evidence that goes against what we believe in
o The original explanation about the belief often survives
o One way to reverse: Think about how the opposite belief might be true
Fake Feedback Study
Gave people fake feedback that they either succeeded or failed in a task
Then told them that the feedback was fake
Had them estimate the number of items they did get right
Hypothetical future
Attribution: How we interpret or explain events
1. Heide’s Naïe Psychology
2. Kelly’s Attiutio Theoy
3. The Fundamental Attribution Error
4. Actor-Observer difference
Heide’s 9 Naïe Psyhology
o People ty to figue out auses of othes’ ehaios
o People itepet othes’ ehaio & gie it eaig
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents