SOC SCI H1G Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Drunk Drivers, Costco, Ford Expedition

• School: UC-Irvine
• Department: Social Science
• Course: SOC SCI H1G
• Professor: Jeff Barrettand Kyle Stanford

Document Summary

What factual beliefs did thomas, stanford, and sarnecka examine: cognitive dissonance. What did they find influencing such factual beliefs without our knowledge or permission: our circumstances influence our memories ((cid:862)fa(cid:272)tual (cid:271)eliefs(cid:863) as (cid:449)e k(cid:374)o(cid:449) or remember them), and this can be done without our conscious recognition. The role that moral judgment is playing in our beliefs about risk. Pare(cid:374)ts" reaso(cid:374) for lea(cid:448)i(cid:374)g, i(cid:374) order fro(cid:373) lo(cid:449)est (cid:862)(cid:373)ea(cid:374) esti(cid:373)ate of risk to (cid:272)hild(cid:863) to highest (how much danger the child is in: accidental/unintentional. People judged the child to be safer than if it were left behind on purpose. It"s al(cid:373)ost (cid:272)ertai(cid:374) that (cid:272)hildre(cid:374) left alo(cid:374)e o(cid:374) purpose are safer because parents can ensure contact and a safe situation and rules, (cid:271)ut people (cid:373)ake the opposite judg(cid:373)e(cid:374)t : work, volunteer, relax, lover. O(cid:374)l(cid:455) the pare(cid:374)t"s reaso(cid:374) for lea(cid:448)i(cid:374)g is (cid:272)ha(cid:374)gi(cid:374)g: the moral outrage the subject feels at the parent seems to affect mean estimate of risk to child .