PHIL 201 Lecture : Taurek and Parfit

77 views1 pages
21 Nov 2013
School
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Tark-numbers-when you make decisions based on a higher number, you might be basing it on something that is immorally irrelevant ground. A drug can either save one person or five people. The obvious thing would be to save the 5. But what if it turns out that that is not based on any good justification. His conclusion is that numbers shouldn"t matter here. P. 941 first argument-i own the drug, i can either save one or five. But the difference is that i know the one person. I am morally permitted to save david-the one. Than there must not be a moral obligation to save the 5. If i am permitted to act on my preference. Which is to save david, than it must imply that there is no obligation to save the greater number. The reason why this is true, is because you cant override obligations with preferences. Obligations are not that easily overridden, only by greater obligations.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents