🏷️ LIMITED TIME OFFER: GET 20% OFF GRADE+ YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION →
Log in
HomeClass Notes1,200,000CA670,000

AHL 1100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: David Bryan, Orlando Patterson

24 views3 pages
harlequinpug542
20 Oct 2021
School
University of Ottawa
Department
Interdisciplinary Study in Arts
Course
AHL 1100
Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Ahl 1100: intro to interdisc in arts (human rights human wrongs) Not the same in all places at all times. A sense of commonality between these things this is demonstrated through codified laws. Significance of status free person vs. slave meant significantly different treatment under the law. More complicated than an either/or type of situation. Serf; bound to the land, does not have freedom of movement but not slave, cannot be sold or bough like a slave or piece of property. Slaves have freedom to run away, but not very likely because they have nowhere to go: this contributes to how a master deals with their slave. If you consider a slave to be a type of a property; it is a specific type of property that has the ability to move or leave. Marking of a slave condoned by law; for a multitude of reasons, claim ownership, identify status as a slave, begins process of dehumanization.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

AHL 1100 Lecture 2: Slavery 1.1
harlequinbeaver574
HIST 3533 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: 1688 Germantown Quaker Petition Against Slavery, Fugitive Slave Laws, Grace Marks
tealwildebeest525
LBST 307 Chapter Notes - Chapter 5: Tobin Tax, Orlando Patterson, Ad Valorem Tax
sangriatoad117

Related Questions

When testing a new treatment, what is the difference between statistical significance and practical significance? Can a treatment have statistical significance, but not practical significance?

A.) Statistical significance is related to whether common sense suggests that the treatment makes enough of a difference to Justify its use. Practical significance is achieved when the result is very unlikely to occur by chance. It is possible for a treatment to have statistical significance, but not practical significance.

B.) Statistical significance is achieved when the result is very unlikely to occur by chance. Practical significance is related to whether common sense suggests that the treatment makes enough of a difference to justify its use. It is not possible for a treatment to have statistical significance, but not practical significance

C.) Statistical significance is related to whether common sense suggests that the treatment makes enough of a difference to justify its use. Practical significance is achieved when the result is very unlikely to occur by chance. It is not possible for a treatment to have statistical significance, but not practical significance

D.) Statistical significance is achieved when the result is very unlikely to occur by chance. Practical significance is related to whether common sense suggests that the treatment makes enough of a difference to justify its use. It is possible for a treatment to have statistical significance, but not practical significance

Reflecting on this week's readings, explain how the civil rights movement brought rights to those ignored or forgotten and how those new rights put more stress and strain on our nation. Write a minimum of two paragraphs for the following discussion prompt:

During the 1960s, African Americans made substantial gains in asserting their freedoms and rights. Discuss how the civil rights movement produced significant social change not only for African Americans, but also for Native Americans, Latinos and women.

1. Data from the caffeine metabolism experiment was pooled together using information from internal and external students across a number of years. The data collected is summarized in the table below. The genotypes are shown in the first column and the other two show the number of genotypes in the two categories of caffeine tolerance (tolerant/intolerant – the classes are derived from the questionnaire data). Use the data in this table to answer this question and others throughout the quiz.

Genotype

Tolerant

Intolerant

AA

148

37

AC

106

99

CC

83

137

What are the genotype frequencies using data from all the individuals measured in this experiment?

Select one:

a. AA=0.40 AC=0.44 CC=0.16

b. AA=0.165 AC=0.439 CC=0.396

c. AA=0.25 AC=0.50 CC=0.25

d. AA=0.303 AC=0.336 CC=0.361

2. What are the allele frequencies using all individuals in the experiment?

Select one:

a. A=0.5 C=0.5

b. A=0.471 C=0.529

c. A=0.371 C=0.629

d. A=0.25 C=0.75

3. What are the expected genotype frequencies under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?

Select one:

a. AA=0.25 AC=0.5 CC=0.25

b. AA=0.333 AC=0.333 CC=0.333

c. AA=0.222 AC=0.498 CC=0.280

d. AA=0.166 AC=0.668 CC=0.166

4. Test if the population is in equilibrium using a chi-square test. What is the chi-square value for this population?

5. What is the correct number of degrees of freedom for the chi-square test from the previous question?

6. Is this population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?

Select one:

True

False

7. What is the genomic location of CYP1A2?

Select one:

a. 21p24.1

b. 7q24.1

c. 15p24.1

d. 15q24.1

8. What is the reported world-wide frequency for the C allele in human populations?

9. Test if the allele frequencies in our population are significantly different from the world-wide frequencies using a chi-square test.

Select one:

a. chi-square = 131.44; 1 degree of freedom, our population's allele frequencies are significantly different from the world-wide estimates

b. chi-square = 1.314; 1 degree of freedom, our population's allele frequencies are not significantly different from the world-wide estimates

c. chi-square = 1.314; 2 degrees of freedom, our population's allele frequencies are not significantly different from the world-wide estimates

d. chi-square = 131.44; 2 degrees of freedom, our population's allele frequencies are significantly different from the world-wide estimates

10. Use a chi-square independence test to determine if the genotypic frequencies differ between the tolerant and intolerant individuals. The chi-square value is: