1
answer
1
watching
635
views
13 Oct 2018
We have discussed in class that fossils show evidence for evolution. This is shown with stunning clarity when the fossil record is complete as with the horse. However, there are instances where the fossil record is not complete which means there are gaps. Someone comes to you and states that because there are gaps in the record for species "A" this shows that evolution is not true. How do you argue against this statement? In other words how do you argue in favor of evolution when gaps are present? Or do these gaps invalidate evolution? Restrict your discussion to the fossil record only.
We have discussed in class that fossils show evidence for evolution. This is shown with stunning clarity when the fossil record is complete as with the horse. However, there are instances where the fossil record is not complete which means there are gaps. Someone comes to you and states that because there are gaps in the record for species "A" this shows that evolution is not true. How do you argue against this statement? In other words how do you argue in favor of evolution when gaps are present? Or do these gaps invalidate evolution? Restrict your discussion to the fossil record only.
1
answer
1
watching
635
views
For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.
Collen VonLv2
16 Oct 2018