1
answer
0
watching
148
views

You are standing at the bottom of a deep canyon in East Africa. While looking at the canyon walls, you notice that there are fairly distinctive layers of soil and rock. In a layer at about your knee level you see a skull (#1) with big teeth and a small cranium (and therefore a small brain). You look upward and in a different layer that is at about eye level you see another skull (#2). It is very similar to the first, but you notice some differences. The teeth are smaller but the cranium is larger. Given this information, answer the following three questions.

1. Which skull is older, #1 or #2?

2. Is that assessment based on relative dating or chronometric dating? Which specific technique is utilized?

3. If you infer that the two skulls are so similar that they are related, but different enough to be different species, does this represent microevolution or macroevolution?

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Bunny Greenfelder
Bunny GreenfelderLv2
29 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in

Related textbook solutions

Related questions

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in