1
answer
0
watching
105
views
18 Jun 2018
We know how evolution has led to the existence of protein families composed of related molecules with similar functions. A few examples are also known where proteins with very similar functions have primary and tertiary structures that show no evidence of evolutionary relationship. Subtilisin and trypsin, for example, are two protein-digesting enzymes (proteases) that show no evidence they are homologous despite the fact they utilize the same mechanism for attacking their substrates. How can this coincidence be explained?
We know how evolution has led to the existence of protein families composed of related molecules with similar functions. A few examples are also known where proteins with very similar functions have primary and tertiary structures that show no evidence of evolutionary relationship. Subtilisin and trypsin, for example, are two protein-digesting enzymes (proteases) that show no evidence they are homologous despite the fact they utilize the same mechanism for attacking their substrates. How can this coincidence be explained?
Keith LeannonLv2
19 Jun 2018