Log in
Economics
1
answer
0
watching
41
views

Choose the correct answer for the below :

Which is better: mindfulness or multitasking?

  1. Multitasking is better because you can do many things at once.
  2. Mindfulness is better because you are focusing on one thing until it is completed.
  3. Mindfulness is better because you can do many things at one time.
  4. Multitasking is better because you are prioritizing tasks and doing them in order.
  5. Multitasking is better because it allows you to spread your attention across many different tasks.

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
41
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Richa Arora
Richa AroraLv10
16 Jan 2021

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics
2nd Edition, 2017
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172364
Principles of Macroeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172388
Principles of Microeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172340

Related questions

One of the arguments for wide, across-the-board military conscription is that it would lower the costs for the armed forces. The argument goes this way: At the present time, the U.S. Armed Forces are voluntary and depend upon enlistments. Because of this, the Armed Forces must offer financial incentives to entice people to go into military service instead of pursuing higher-paying civilian jobs. A draft would pull men and women from all kinds of occupations that would be useful to the Armed Forces, and authorities could pay them less than they do now for enlisted people who do the same things for the military services. Therefore, the argument goes, if the government can save money for things like medical and legal services (draft doctors and lawyers along with others), then the whole country saves money because the cost of financing the armed forces is lower. That being the case, according to the advocates of the draft, American society is better off. Is this a sound economic argument? Why or why not?

I do not think that maximin gives us a good reasons to choose Rawls' two principles of justice compared to the other theories. Rawls idea of raises many questions. He thinks that inequality can be justified only by the benefits for the least advantaged. However, I acknowledged the fact that Nozick argued that if things are made by a certain group of people, they have the rights to do whatever they want with it. With that being said, trying to favor the least advantage group are unjust because it makes some advantaged people work for the least advantaged group in order to "balance" out. This is kind of unfair to the advantaged group of people. They might have been working it through time and effort and the other group might just sit there and wait for them to distribute the resources. Thus, the U.S would not be more if we followed the difference principle since the differential principle gives expression to the idea that natural endowments are undeserved. The fact that citizens have different talents and abilities can be used to make everyone better off (according to Rawls). Instead, in reality, if a society really applies that principle, people will rely on it and becomes inefficient from thinking, "oh, if I don't put much effort into this, it's okay" since the advantaged group will covers the rest.
Do you agree to this? Please state your reasons.

For questions 1, 2, 3, and 6 you are welcome to use Wikipedia. However, you should cite at least two other sources in each question. Your sources should be identified at the end of each answer. As you can see by now many of the assignments are very important to our understanding of the topics, but they have not been integrated as well into the course as I would like. This assignment is very different. Much of the discussion here is to better understand Latin America, a region of the world that we will need to skip because of time constraints. Some of you will be writing a country report about one that uses ISI. Some of this information may be useful to include in your report. Other sources you could consult are in the reference section of the library or you can ask a librarian for help. 1. What is Import Substitution Industrialization? (between 200-400 words) 2. Raul Prebisch was one of the prominent proponents of ISI, write a short biography of him (between 200-400 words) 3. Explain why Prebisch and others proposed ISI (up to 250 words). 4. Visit the site EconoMonitor and once there search for the article On Populism in Argentina (and other Latin American Countries) by Nicholas Magud published June 25th, 2008. Summarize it. 5. Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Mexico, and Bolivia among many countries followed both ISI and Economic populism. Visit the IMF site at www.imf.org and click on Data and Statistics, then click on World Economic Outlook Databases, select the October 2014 database,and select By Countries, next Latin America and the Caribbean. Find inflation in percent change for Argentina, since 1980 to date and graph the data in several sub-periods so it can show the different inflation rates better. In a couple paragraphs describe what you see. 6. Brazil, Chile, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, and India followed ISI and different levels of Economic Populism, choose one of these five countries and explain when your selected country followed ISI and when it stopped following ISI? Why did your country stop using ISI? What were the consequences of ISI and Economic Populism in your country? (no less than 250 words and up to 700 words)

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Economics 400,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in