You are working at an investment firm that has many investments in Lithuania. You have been asked to do a simple simulation showing the potential effects of Lithuania building a high-speed rail network, and what will happen if there is worldwide pressure on interest rates. All amounts are in millions of Litas. (The Lita is the Lithuanian currency. For this example use the exchange rate you compute, not the actual exchange rate). Government spending is projected to rise by 50 percent due to construction of the high-speed rail network
This is the status quo scenario
Total Output is equal to 5,000
Government spending is equal to 1,000
Tax revenue is equal to 1,000
Consumption is equal to 250+0.75*(Y-T);
The level of investment is 1,000-50r;
Net Exports are 500-500?,
the world real interest rate is five percent Assume that there are three political parties in Lithuania and each think that building the high speed rail network will have different effects on the economy. They have hired you as a consultant (moonlighting from your investment firm) to do an analysis showing what happens if their beliefs end up being true
a. THE LIBERAL PARTY believes that increasing government spending to build the high speed rail network will increase both G and GDP. That is G, will increase to 1,500 and GDP will increase by 500 too. Compare what happens to the economy (relative to the status quo) if the Liberal party is correct. How do private savings, public savings, national savings, investment, net exports, and the exchange rate change from the status quo?
b. THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY believes that building a high speed rail network will put people to work (thus increasing G), but that it will ultimately be useless (there will be no overall wealth created), so GDP will be unchanged. The conservatives are also concerned that the government taking on new debt will be a bad sign to Lithuania�s creditors, and that borrowing the money for the high-speed rail system will cause the interest rate to rise 20 percent. Under this scenario, how do private savings, public savings, national savings, investment, net exports, and the exchange rate change from the status quo?
c. THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY believes that taking tax money and using it to build a high-speed rail network does nothing more than take money from one group of people (taxpayers) and give it to another group of people (the construction industry) and that there is no productive economic impact. How do private savings, public savings, national savings, Net exports, and the exchange rate change from the status quo?
d. Please compare situations a, b, and c. Who do you think is correct, and why?
e. The Libertarians use a microeconomics explanation about taxation to argue that the economy will be helped most by simply reducing taxes, even if people only save the money that they don�t spend on taxes (C is not affected). They say that this phenomenon is assumed away by most macro-economists. What are they referring to?
You are working at an investment firm that has many investments in Lithuania. You have been asked to do a simple simulation showing the potential effects of Lithuania building a high-speed rail network, and what will happen if there is worldwide pressure on interest rates. All amounts are in millions of Litas. (The Lita is the Lithuanian currency. For this example use the exchange rate you compute, not the actual exchange rate). Government spending is projected to rise by 50 percent due to construction of the high-speed rail network
This is the status quo scenario
Total Output is equal to 5,000
Government spending is equal to 1,000
Tax revenue is equal to 1,000
Consumption is equal to 250+0.75*(Y-T);
The level of investment is 1,000-50r;
Net Exports are 500-500?,
the world real interest rate is five percent Assume that there are three political parties in Lithuania and each think that building the high speed rail network will have different effects on the economy. They have hired you as a consultant (moonlighting from your investment firm) to do an analysis showing what happens if their beliefs end up being true
a. THE LIBERAL PARTY believes that increasing government spending to build the high speed rail network will increase both G and GDP. That is G, will increase to 1,500 and GDP will increase by 500 too. Compare what happens to the economy (relative to the status quo) if the Liberal party is correct. How do private savings, public savings, national savings, investment, net exports, and the exchange rate change from the status quo?
b. THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY believes that building a high speed rail network will put people to work (thus increasing G), but that it will ultimately be useless (there will be no overall wealth created), so GDP will be unchanged. The conservatives are also concerned that the government taking on new debt will be a bad sign to Lithuania�s creditors, and that borrowing the money for the high-speed rail system will cause the interest rate to rise 20 percent. Under this scenario, how do private savings, public savings, national savings, investment, net exports, and the exchange rate change from the status quo?
c. THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY believes that taking tax money and using it to build a high-speed rail network does nothing more than take money from one group of people (taxpayers) and give it to another group of people (the construction industry) and that there is no productive economic impact. How do private savings, public savings, national savings, Net exports, and the exchange rate change from the status quo?
d. Please compare situations a, b, and c. Who do you think is correct, and why?
e. The Libertarians use a microeconomics explanation about taxation to argue that the economy will be helped most by simply reducing taxes, even if people only save the money that they don�t spend on taxes (C is not affected). They say that this phenomenon is assumed away by most macro-economists. What are they referring to?
Related textbook solutions
Related questions
Question 1 to 9. Choose TRUE or FALSE. WILL RATE 5 stars for a correct answer
|
1. |
1. Flow of Funds Direct spending by the government on health care in 2012 was almost $ 4,500. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2. |
Flow of Funds Payments to hospitals and physicians account for about half of all health care spending in 2012. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3. |
Flow of Funds Over the past 100 years, out-of-pocket expenditures for health care services by individuals have decreased from over 75% to less than 5%. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4. |
Flow of Funds Third-party payers account for 60% of all health care expenditures in 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5. |
Flow of Funds The dollar amount of health care expenditures paid by charitable organizations and individuals has remained roughly constant over the past 100 years if one adjusts for inflation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
6. Flow of Funds Ranking everyone by the amount spent on medical care, 30 percent of the total (all expenditures for all people) is accounted for by the top 1 percent of patients. The top half of the population accounts for 90 percent of total spending. This is mostly due to cost-shifting. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7. Flow of Funds Not only is the share of GDP to health care higher in 2012 than in 1929, but the wages of health care workers have also risen concerning wages of other types of workers. The Flow of Funds idea emphasizes that total dollars spent by individuals, the government, and other third-party payers for health care must equal total income earned by health care providers, administrators, and other health care workers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8. Equity and Distribution Socioeconomic differences in mortality found in the U.S. are most likely attributable to a lack of universal health insurance coverage. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
9. Shifting Overhead When a drug company advertises it will provide a prescription drug at no charge to certain individuals who cannot afford a doctor prescribed drug, costs are most likely being shifted away from individuals who are paying high prices to those who are paying nothing.
|
