Philosophy 2080 Lecture : Online Sample Questions.docx

• School: Western University
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: Philosophy 2080
• Professor: James Hildebrand

Document Summary

Acs sample question: in the case the attorney general of quebec v. la chaussure brown"s inc. et al. , the supreme. Court of canada held that: a) commercial expression was of limited value, and was therefore not deserving of protection under the charter: the provincial statute limiting business signs to be french language only, violated s. 2(b) of the. Charter: although the offending provincial statute violated the charter, it was saved by s. 33 of the. Think: movie theatre, bar, these are businesses that benefit the occupier of lands: (c) That"s right, the defendant argued that even if everything the plaintiff said was true, the law did not recognize this as a law suit. That is why the plaintiff didn"t have to give any evidence, the defendant admitted the truth of her allegations: (b) And remember, it need only be that person"s honestly held opinion, it is not necessary that other people in the community agree with that opinion, the law protects the.