ndwiehLv1

3 Jun 2024

this is the Topic: Artificial Intelligence's Capability to Improve Mental Health Services

The literature review must be organized in a way that makes readers understand the studies you are reporting on because they include a lot of information in a limited amount of space. Two popular methods for doing literature reviews are topical, which groups studies according to a subject or theme, and chronological, which arranges papers in order of publication date. In addition to purposefully selecting a broad framework that suits the writer's subject, the writer should aid readers with headings, include succinct summaries at key points in the review, and use language that clearly identifies the scope of specific studies within the field of inquiry, the studies under review, and the area of the writer's own research. It could be beneficial to ask yourself some of the following questions whether you are editing your own or a peer's literature review:

Concerns Regarding Revision
1) Is the literature review arranged topically or chronologically? Is the author's method of writing the review clearly defined?
2) Does the author make use of headings or paragraph breaks to highlight differences between the study groups that are being examined?
3) Does the author provide a clear relationship to his or her topic to explain why particular study groups (or individual research) are being reviewed?
4) Does the author clearly state which of the mentioned studies are the most significant?
5) Has the author covered every significant field of inquiry into the subject matter?
6) Does the author employ summaries and transitions to smoothly flow from one study or series of studies to the next?

7) Is it evident why the present research is required by the end of the literature review?

also remember this is a draft so you might want to concentrate on the first and last paragraphs. also 400 words minimum