PHILOS 1B03 Study Guide - Final Guide: Civil Disobedience, Inductive Reasoning, Harm Principle
4 Nov 2014
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Section a: short answer: based off lecture and powerpoint, one paragraph to two paragraphs. Only time legal/social restrictions should occur if the actions of an individual create any sort of harm and contain evidence of such: marketplace of ideas. Whether opinion is right or wrong, society benefits from hearing it: devlin, legal moralist position, know why he thinks society should have a moral framework. Thinks it"s necessary: reasonable man standard, cole, argues judicial review in times of emergency, know two of his arguments for judicial, judiciary very good post-crisis. Judiciary just as bad as legislation after emergency, just as likely to have. Knee-jerk" reaction , but very good post-crisis: judicial review obligated to treat old cases. Tolerance test and the harm test: feinberg"s second view + mackinnon + sumner on hate speech, freedom of. Final exam: covers entire term with some emphasis on material covered in the 2nd half, focus slightly more on second half.
