Study Guides (258,771)
CA (125,000)
McMaster (7,782)
POLSCI (225)

3NN6 Hypothetical Question 2013.docx

2 Pages
231 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POLSCI 3NN6
Professor
Greg Flynn

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Started on: 11/28/2013 12:34:00 PM
Angie © McMaster University
Fall 2013
1
CLASS NOTES FOR: 3NN6
McMaster University, Fall 2013
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2013
Exam Question 2 HYPOTHETICAL
ISSUE: Does the federal have jurisdiction
PURPOSE: What is the purpose of the legislation?
- Conservation of the forest industry
- Preventing the spread of the pine beetles (kill bugs)
- Economic preservation
PARSONS TEST:
- Check section 92 Then 91
o Assuming that it does not fall under section 92 we go to section 91
- 92 (13) Property and Civil Rights
o Yoni and Jean-Marc entered into a CONTRACT so it falls under section 92.
- According to Parsons we also see under section 91
o Does it fall under 91 (2) Trade & Commerce or Criminal Law/POGG
o TRADE AND COMMERCE
How do we decide whether something falls under the trade and commerce?
INTERNATIONAL AND INTER-PROVINCIAL TRADE (PARSONS,
BORDER REGULATIONS)
Does the trade of Yoni and Marc international or interprovincial?
- What about the Caloil case? Primary purpose is the primary enactment,
but it has an incidental impact. CONSIDERING INCIDENTAL IMPACT
on the provincial rights.
TRADE AFFECTING THE DOMINION AS A WHOLE (LASKIN)
Were part of a general regulatory scheme
o A plan in place that sets out rules as to how something is
governed (pine beetle control act is!)
That was monitored and had continuing oversight by a regulatory
agency
o Yes, it is called the Canada Lumber Agency
Must be concerned with trade affecting the country as a whole, not
just a specific industry
o The nature of the problem suggests that it’s a single
industry; but it can be the country as a whole, because it
covers everyone who might use LUMBER (e.g. building,
transportation, etc.)
ADDING 2 MORE: to ensure that there is a BALANCE between
91 and 92, does not want to go far to upset the balance between the
two

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Started on: 11/28/2013 12:34:00 PM C LASS N OTES FOR : 3NN6 McMaster University, Fall 2013 T HURSDAY , NOVEMBER 28, 2013 Exam Question 2 HYPOTHETICAL ISSUE: Does the federal have jurisdiction PURPOSE: What is the purpose of the legislation? - Conservation of the forest industry - Preventing the spread of the pine beetles (kill bugs) - Economic preservation PARSONS TEST: - Check section 92  Then 91 o Assuming that it does not fall under section 92 we go to section 91 - 92 (13) – Property and Civil Rights o Yoni and Jean-Marc entered into a CONTRACT so it falls under section 92. - According to Parsons we also see under section 91 o Does it fall under 91 (2) Trade & Commerce or Criminal Law/POGG o TRADE AND COMMERCE  How do we decide whether something falls under the trade and commerce? INTERNATIONAL AND INTER-PROVINCIAL TRADE (PARSONS, BORDER REGULATIONS)  – Does the trade of Yoni and Marc international or interprovincial?  - What about the Caloil case? Primary purpose is the primary enactment, but it has an incidental impact. CONSIDERING INCIDENTAL IMPACT on the provincial rights.  TRADE AFFECTING THE DOMINION AS A WHOLE (LASKIN)  Were part of a general regulatory scheme o A plan in place that sets out rules as to how something is governed (pine beetle control act is!)  That was monitored and had continuing oversight by a regulatory agency o Yes, it is called the Canada Lumber Agency  Must be concerned with trade affecting the country as a whole, not just a specific industry o The nature of the problem suggests that it’s a single industry; but it can be the country as a whole, because it covers everyone who might use LUMBER (e.g. building, transportation, etc.)  ADDING 2 MORE: to ensure that there is a BALANCE between 91 and 92, does not want to go far to upset the balance between the two Angie © McMaster University 1 Fall 2013 Started on: 11/28/2013 12:34:00 PM  Fourth, the legislation should be of a nature that the provinces would be unconstitutionally capable of enacting. o How would a province enforce outside of the jurisdiction if it needed to do? ; In this case, provinces are incapable YES;  Fifth, that the failure to include a pr
More Less
Unlock Document


Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit