LAW 122 Study Guide - Final Guide: Implied Consent, Woodbine Racetrack, The Jockey Club
2 Apr 2017
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
), then we state the law (the legal test). The elements (factors/ingredients/checklist) to show that a particular tort has occurred. Say it in the abstract , as a general principle. Now that we have the law, stated as a general principle, let"s move to the specifics of this case. Your application is your conclusion, and the answer to the issue question. Russo, the plaintiff, was a very skilled bettor and had won a lot of money at horse racing tracks owned by the defendant, the ontario jockey club. So, the defendant served her with a notice while she was at woodbine racetrack in to that required her to leave the premises. The notice also said that if she returned to any of the defendant"s premises, she would be charged as a trespasser. Can the ontario jockey club legally keep russo off their property (woodbine. There is implied consent, and they withdrew consent, which is legally allowed.
