SSH 105 Study Guide - Comprehensive Final Exam Guide - Modus Ponens, Hypothetical Syllogism, Modus Tollens

• School: Ryerson University
• Department: Social Sciences and Humanities
• Course: SSH 105
• Professor: Klaas Kraay

Document Summary

When people declare something is the case. No beauty, taste, ethics etc. can be atheist realist, agnostic realist etc. I don"t think there is any objective facts this may be an attractive position because. Nihilism about everything is self-defeating- saying there are no truths and furthermore that statement is true is contradicting. Relativism (about truth in some subject area) i. ii. That"s true for me / that"s my truth . It"s true for me that calculus is easy, but it is true for you that it is hard . That"s true for us / that"s our truth . If i get an a, then i pass ssh105: p 2. Deductively weak an argument can be weak (for a person at a time) in three ways. 1. its invalid: not r/j/r to believe one or more of the argument"s premises based on available evidence, all of the above.