Study Guides (248,586)
Canada (121,629)
Psychology (952)
PSYC 2310 (78)
Midterm

Social Psychology Notes PreMidterm 2.docx

10 Pages
55 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2310
Professor
Saba Safdar
Semester
Winter

Description
Social Psychology Notes Pre-Midterm 2 Obedience and February 9, 2012 - Asch Study Across Cultures o Version of Asch’s experiments have been replicated in more than a dozen studies - Conformity across cultures o Hunting and gathering societies and upper social segments of industrial societies, are low in conformity - Berry’s study o Correlated the degree of independence with the sample’s position on an ecocultural dimension o He found a correlation of 0.70 between ecocultural dimension of self-reliance and independence or nonconformity - Definition of obedience o Obedience is conformity in response to the commands of an authority figure - Obedience to the authority o Milgram o Shocking study o Milgram’s experiments re-visited (2007) - Intense indoctrination o How to cult groups manage to exert such total control over the lives of their members? 1. Softening-up stage 2. Compliance stage 3. Internalization stage 4. Consolidation stage o These reduce attentional capacity - Power distance o Power distance refers to the tendency to see a large distance between those in the upper versus lower parts of a social structure o High: Mexico, Guatemala. Low: Scandinavian, Austria, is real - Cultural differences o Meta analysis indicated that obedience ranges from a low of 16% among female students in Australia to 92% in the Netherlands - Obedience and individuals differences o Personal characteristics related to obedience:  Authoritarian submission  Internal-external locus of control dimension Tuesday February 14, 2011 - Method of Investigation o Controlled experiment  Advantage: provides context for addressing whether or not an effect is real and which theoretical account explains it  Disadvantage: o Six Principles of Social Influence  Robert Cialdini found that the key to successful influence was what we do before attempting to influence  Reciprocation  Complying with a request of someone who has previously provided a favour  Study by Berry and Kanouse those who got money at beginning of questionnaire were significantly more likely to complete the questionnaire. Only a few people who did not complete questionnaire cashed the cheque.  Door-in-the-face technique (reciprocal concessions procedure)  Social Validation (Consensus)  Complying with a request if it is consistent with what similar others are thinking or doing  Based on Social Comparison Theory  We follow the lead of many others and similar others  Consistency  After committing to a position, one is more likely to complying with requests that are consistent with that position  Foot-in-the-door technique  Legitimization-of-paltry-favours (or even a penny would help) technique  Friendship/ Liking  One is more likely to comply with the requests of friends or other liked individuals  Increasing friendship/liking: o Similarity o Compliment o Cooperation o Physical Attractiveness  Scarcity  One tries to secure opportunities that are scarce  Sources of power of scarcity: o Scarcity means better quality o Scarcity interferes with personal freedom and people react against the interference by wanting to posses the item more: based on reactance theory  Authority  One complies to the request of someone who is a legitimate authority Thursday, February 16, 2012 Cultural Context of Persuasion: Communication and Commercialism - Stages of competence o Effective communication  Isomorphic attribution o Four stages of competence  Unconscious incompetence  Conscious incompetence (you realize misunderstanding of behaviour, do not have frame of reference to behave properly)  Conscious competence  Unconscious competence o Source and structure of message  Best sources of message  Individualist: credible, expert and winner  Collectivist: older males, famous families  Structure of message  Individualist: linear, conclusion is supported through inductive or deductive reasoning  Collectivist: “beating around the bush” o Paralinguistic Communication  How we behave, eye contact, touching,  Eye contact  High level on eye contact: Arabs, Latin American, Southern Europeans  Low level: Asians, Indians, Northern Europeans  Touching  Parts of body being touched is culturally determined o Comparison of American and Japanese  Culture Differences: o Comparison of touching behaviour among American, Italian, and Czech o Hand touch and non-hand touch were observed among 120 participants o Results: Czech men engaged in more hand touching  Hand touching is associated with power and societies where gender roles are more traditional, there is more asymmetry in this behaviour  No gender differences among Americans  Results: Non-hand touching (hugs, kiss cheeks)  Italian women engage in more. Women engage in more in traditional societies. - Physical differences o Japanese stay farthest apart, Venezuela stand closest, Americans in between o Women require less space than men - Six factors of influence o Social influence in US, China, Spain, Germany  Reciprocation very important (US)  Authority (China)  Friendship and Liking (Spain)  Consistency (Germany) - Physical attractiveness o 1500 Italian men viewed attractive female newscaster o Asked how much news can you recall? o Captured by newscasters lips o ¾ failed to remember anything during first 30 seconds o Attention levels go back to normal after 2minutes o 40% remembered the news if newscaster was attractive vs. 72% who viewed an unattractive newscaster - Modern propaganda o Characteristics o modern persuasion  Use of peripheral route  The message-dense environment  30 second ad  The immediacy of persuasion Tuesday February 28, 2012 - Group elements o Some central elements in conceptualisation of a group:  Common goal  Social structure  Face-to-face (or some form of) interaction  Self-categorisation - Basic group processes o Individualist: Allport  There is nothing more to a group than the people who comprise it o Collectivist: Sherif  There is something more to a group than just the people who comprise it - Group structure o Norms  Morns are ways of specifying what are acceptable (or unacceptable) attitudes and behaviours of group members o Functions of norms  For individuals: norms are frame of reference to interpret the world, provides predictability, and useful in novel situations  For group: norms serve as social regulation that helps the group runs smoothly and enhance group identity o General norms: we can violate a little bit (clothing)
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2310

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit