Study Guides (390,000)
CA (150,000)
UBC (5,000)
PSYC (700)
Midterm

PSYC 305 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Discriminant Validity, Construct Validity, Discriminant


Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 305
Professor
Sunaina Assanand
Study Guide
Midterm

This preview shows pages 1-3. to view the full 13 pages of the document.
Personality & Research Methods Chapters 1&2
WHAT IS PERSONALITY?
- Pesoalit: dai ogaizatio, iside the peso, of pshophsial sstes that eate the peso’s
characteristic patterns of behavior, thoughts, and feelings
1. pshophsial our personality is a product of biological systems tied to physical body
2. dai  personalities are responsive, gives personality ability to change to immediate requirements
3. ogaizatio well organized biological systems give rise to actions/reactions
4. eate personality is a causal force (creates behaviours, thoughts, behaviours, is a driving force)
5. haateisti pattes personality creates characteristic patterns, essence that remains constant
despite short term changes
6. ehaiou, thoughts, ad feeligs personality manifests on multiple levels (behavior, cognitive,
emotional), many ways
Two fundamental themes in Personality Psychology
1. Individual differences: each person is diff from everyone else (even twins)
2. Intrapersonal functioning: processes w/in person that lead you to act the way you do
Why study personality?
- Personality psychology has 3 goals:
1. Descriptive goal
2. Explanatory goal explain personality
3. Predictive goal applied settings (predicting actions/reactions) eg. clinical, military, corporate used
less
Clinicians use this to predict what will happen to patients
Military & corporate predict the most well suited to combat
WHAT IS A THEORY?
- Theory: proposed explanation/interpretation of the relations among constructs
Set of ideas about how to think about class of events, testable
o EXPLAIN & PREDICT NEW INFO
- Costut: oeptual/hpothetial aiale that a’t e dietl oseed
Eg. happiness, intelligence, aggressiveness, optimism, ethnicity (every racial classification is diff)
Ask self: Do I need to figure out how to measure this then it is a construct
Not constructs:
o Eg. salary, grade, hair colour, eye colour, weight, height, blood pressure
o Directly observable
Is personality a construct? Yes. (Need to figure out a way to measure personality)
- Good theory explains content, advance understanding (predict)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com

Only pages 1-3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Theories serve 2 functions:
1. Synthesizing function: organize and explain observations
2. Heuristic function: Generate predictions (eg. hypotheses) when tested, advance our understanding
Criteria used to evaluate the quality of a theory:
1. Comprehensiveness: does the theory explain the bulk of the content? (yes = good theory, no = bad)
2. Heuristic value: does the theory generate/advance our understanding? (yes = good theory, no = bad)
3. Parsimony: # of constructs are included in a theory (few constructs > many constructs the fewer the better)
4. Testability: theory can be tested (generate predictions/hyp that allow us to gather empirical evidence)
Eg. psychoanalysis: predictions/hyp are diff to test
o Most relate to the unconscious mind inaccessible
o If we cannot retrieve, then unable to test
How is research used to test a theory?
- Researchers must identify observable variables that reflect constructs of interest
- Operationalization: translation of construct into a variables we can observe/measure
- Examples of operationalizations:
Eg. Construct: Aggressiveness
o Operationalization: frequency and intensity of shocks given to a confederate
o More shocks = more aggressive
Eg. Construct: Intelligence
o Operationalization: scores on an IQ test
Eg. Construct: Self-esteem
o Operationalization: scores on a self-report measure of global self-worth
Eg. Construct: PERSONALITY (singular construct)
o Operationalization: ?
HOW ARE PERSONALITY VARIABLES MEASURED?
Are operationalized (translated into observable variables) using
several techniques:
- Observer ratings (eg. interview, behavioural observations,
informant data)
Interviewer is observing responses of participant
Behavioural observations watch participant
Informant data not trained, but acquainted with the topic
- Implicit assessments (eg. Rorschach Ink Blot Test, Picture Story Exercise)
Assesses unconscious components of the mind
Blot test 2nd most commonly used test in forensic psych (criticized for low reliability)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com

Only pages 1-3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

- Self-reports (most common)
T/F ites, eithe hae o do’t hae the ualit ot i etee, checklists
Roseeg’s “elf-Esteem Scale (rate self on scale 1-5)
Unstructured Self-Report: Twenty-“tateets Test oplete stateet I a 
RESEARCH METHODS
- Personology: study of the whole person, rather than just one aspect
- Experience sampling: ppl report repeatedly on their current experiences
Idiographic method: approach that focuses on individual (exp sampling & case studies)
Correlation
- Correlation: if values of two variables go together (no manipulation, long duration)
Direction (+ve/-ve) & strength (less scatter = strong; more scatter = weak) of the correlation
High + high numbers (low + low numbers) positive correlation
Low + high numbers negative/inverse correlation
- Coelatio do’t tell WHY aiales go togethe
Cannot conclude cause and effect
Causality: relationship b/w cause and effect
Third variable problem: unmeasured variable may cause the variations in both of the correlated variables
- Correlation coefficient (r): strength of correlation
Perfect +ve correlation = 1.0
- Statistically significant: when probability is small relationship is real, not random occurrence
Clinically/practically significant: association large enough to have some practical importance
Experimental Research
- Experimental method: one variable is manipulated to test for causal influence on another variable
Demonstrates cause and effect, COMPARISON b/w groups, short duration
Shows that manipulation auses the diffeee, ut do’t ko what it was about it that did the causing
- Independent variable (cause) = manipulated
- Dependent variable = measured
- Experimental control: holding non-manipulated variables constant
- Random assignment: putting ppl randomly into groups
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version