FULL Second Term POL203 notes to April 5/2012 For HURL --- Goes with other Exam note previously uploaded

40 Pages
237 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL203Y1
Professor
Ryan Hurl
Semester
Winter

Description
1/19/12 Political Parties and Re-Alignment - Essay: Show that you can explain a question in political science the disagreement dont know what the truth is. Review : Elections and The Impact of Presidential Primaries - Once you have a shift from the older system, youre creating a more disconnect from the public because participants in primary elections are ideologically speaking are not going to be reflective of the general public - Problems; major: its difficult to see whether the initial assumption is true. - Undoubted affect: money!!! Running for election becomes a full time job much earlier in the electoral process and costs a lot of $$; also, this will prevent particular candidates from running at all Party-dominated Mixed Electability, Moderation, Party Unity, Effective Governance System Public, contested, extended Primary Consequences: party disunity, ideological extremism, ineffective governance? only system Campaign Finance Reform *Major amendments were added in 1974 ** Such as Buckley v. Valleo, 1976 FECA, 1971*: reporting, donation limits, partial public funding Judicial Intervention**: no individual* or overall spending limits; hard vs. soft money BCRA , the Great Money Chase, and Citizens United Basic dynamic of CFR congress makes attempt to constrain spending by creating certain hard money limits (individuals or groups of individuals to candidates) courts step in to remove some limits (such as individuals on own campaigns) reduces effectiveness of law money seems to find a way to protect itself - At some point, shouldnt individual rights bend? - Broader issue- do we really want to create a situation where rights are put aside once we conceive another public good as more important???? o One of the typical reactions of the citizens united is it places restrictions on unions and corporations and they are not people!!!!! o It could lead people to limit the role of money in other ways Eg; primary reform!!! (which will never happen) Any attempt to alter the scope of the primary system would be see as a retreat from democracy o Campaign finance also increases access / lobbying Parties and elections 1. Parties and Ideology in American Politics 2. Critical Elections and Re-alignment? 3. Political Parties from Clinton to Obama Key idea: Party ideology is relatively stable; electoral coalitions are not. Three Aspects of Parties Parties in the Electorate Parties in Parties as Government Organizations - They are organizations that attempt to influence politics by running elections and getting into political office - Parties in the electorate party supporters // consisting of a set of coalitions, either regional, religions, etc probably the major fault line is how the party relates to CLASS! - Parties as Organizations various officials, actionaries, who are involved in helping certain candidates to win elections - Parties in government role parties play in organizing party legislators Ideology Thermometer Scores of Party Identifiers and Activists Notes: Activists are defined as respondents who engaged in 3 or more campaign activities as coded in vcf0723. Leaners are coded as partisans. The Liberal/Conservative Index (vcf0801) measures a respondent's relative thermometer ratings of "Liberals" and "Conservatives." It is calculated by subtracting the Liberal Thermometer score from 97 and averaging the result with the Conservative Thermometer score. Cases are weighted by vcf0009. - This graph relative ideological difference between identifiers and activists (low = left wing) - There are differences: - Even now party polarization is an elite level phenomenon o Partisan elites are far apart and the public is in the middle Why is there a 2 party system in the USA? Ideological Limits Dual The Rules culture of the Game* Two Party System * e.g. first past the post elections (Congress) and electoral college system limits the scope of third parties (in contrast with systems based on some kind of proportional representation; ballot access restrictions, campaign finance laws - Notion that theres a limited ideological spectrum its not just that it has a 2 party system, its that they arent that far apart on issues, and theres no ideological room in the US for a socialist party - The underlying nature of political in the US has always had a sort of duality the political interests tend to produce different blocks of voters that tend to be more or less sustained over time - The rules of the game itself is going to inhibit 3 parties, but its a weak argument because the US doesnt have proportional representation aka the rules prevent this from happening Canada has this?? - In contrast to people who say parties are basically the same they are really different party ideology as manifested in the set of beliefs by party elites Party Ideology: Consensus or Conflict? - Parties have exhibited relative similar ideologies but they have changed - The most interesting change in the N Democrat party in between the stages, you have sub developments - The shift in the republican party is interesting its roots were Party Platforms and Ideology The Theory of Electoral Alignments, Critical Elections, Re- Alignments - The given array of social demographic interest will create a dominant party - You have stable sets of coalitions, and you will have a disruption according to the theory - The underlying dynamics are sometimes difficult to identify - Why the democratic support weakened in 1930s basically had to do with rights liberal voters and African americans Electoral Alignment Critical Elections Re-Alignment Party coalitions competitiveness Dominant Disrupting Events Shift in voting blocs party/public Elections/Series of Shift in public philosophy Elections that shift philosophy/issues Public Participation electoral coalitions Shift in participation? - De-Alignment and the Decline of Parties, post-1968: signs and causesWhy is the shift to the republican party so decisive Split-Ticket voand partyology balancing Candidate- centered Incumbency campaigning Advantage Interest Group Politics and De- mobilization - Idea that candidates are deliberately separating themselves from the ideals of their parties, so they are able to salvage their own careers even if their party is becoming unpopular o Eg: senators or legislators creating district specific spending cuts
More Less

Related notes for POL203Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit