Law 2101 Study Guide - Quiz Guide: Bashar Al-Assad, Lawfare, Tinder
Document Summary
Possible legal justification from the us: lisann"s argument: significant precedent in il based on confluence of events even if there are. Emergency meeting of the unsc (2017: two sides at the unsc meeting, us and allies: it was time to say enough, but not only say it, it was time to act. On what basis: ethically, consequentially people haven"t used chemical weapons that much after, note: international law vs. justice/ morality. Il is not always moral: voting outcome. Theorizing about il: debate: il & ir scholars, key: il vs. domestic law, no sovereign above the states, no legislator, no police force, department of justice, prosecutors, (enforcement, bottom line: il much messier; consent-based; horizontal. Il went through crisis in mid-19th century; john austin (hardcore positivist) said that it wasn"t even law: austinian challenge led late 19th century lawyers to try to make il more positivist and. Scientific : today, il seen as law proper but debates remain.
