Study Guides (248,639)
Canada (121,648)
Philosophy (375)

Constitutional law lecture March 13th.docx

2 Pages
125 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
Philosophy 2080
Professor
Jeannie Gillmore

This preview shows 80% of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Description
Constitutional law lecture March 13h  American law comes from the first amendment  United states: freedom of expression covers private activity as well as government action  Canada: charter litigation—winning the authority or the actions of government entity and government agencies  Disputes between private parties = does not have anything to do with freedom of expression  But in United States, it covers privately as well  Glenn Beck: American conservative: right wing view o 2005 “I think I can kill Michael Moore”—gave people ideas to kill/shoot Michael Moore o He hired people to follow him around so people can’t kill him o What can Michael Moore do? —You can probably sue him o Controversial—did he really cause those people to attempt to kill him? o Freedom of speech in America is much more of a robust concept  Incitement to violence  In America, church and state is two different thing  Freedom of speech cases: section 2 of charter of rights and freedom  R v. Keegstra o A lot of people still do not agree with the implications of this case o Human rights case in Saskatchewan: small population o High school teacher from Alberta who promoted anti Semitism o Defended on the grounds of “freedom of speech” o Charged under the offence criminal code of Canada “willfully promoting hatred under an identifiable group” o Residual effect in the community—did not fully eradicate o Before the trial he brought in an application to bring down the case on the grounds of:  Section 319 (3) of Criminal Code of Canada: if you can prove what you said is true, you cannot be charged  Section (11) of Charter: right to be presumed innocent  Application of the oaks test  Inhibiting freedom of expression and forcing him to prove o Court of Alberta did not allow the application o Insufficient notice: section 319 o He appealed the decision to Alberta court of Appeal and won o Found that 319 and section 11 o Crown appealed the decision o Application of the oaks test  Majority opinion: split court  Controversial  Complicated issue  Does the activity fall betwee
More Less
Unlock Document

Only 80% of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit