Philosophy 2715F/G Study Guide - Comprehensive Final Exam Guide - Canada, Informed Consent, Sentience
20 Nov 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Quizzes: 4 questions, definitions and arguments (sometimes counterarguments too, always on wednesdays. Final exam: questions are very similar if not the same to quizzes, plus, case analysis. Important to consider both the administrators as well as the society at large too: not only think about what certain principles imply for particular cases, but what these principles imply for all cases of the same nature. If x then y: not y, thus, not x. If the parents are deciding responsibly for baby j then the decision is in his best interests: the decision is not in his best interests, thus, the parents are not deciding responsibly for baby j, hypothetical syllogism. If x then y: thus, if w then y. If baby j is vegetative then he cannot experience benefit. Invalid arguments, that is, the truth of the premises do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Tutorial notes january 15, 2018: premise (support for conclusion) vs. conclusion (statement)
