cw notes.docx

6 Pages
70 Views
Unlock Document

Department
American Studies
Course
AMH 2020
Professor
Jeffrey Adler
Semester
Fall

Description
1. The Popular Sovereignty Panacea 1. The Mexican Cession lands opened a "can of worms" with the question, "What should be done about slavery in these lands?" 2. Further, with this question, the political parties (Whig and Democrat) were put into a tricky position. No matter which way they answered, half of the nation would be offended. 1. Largely, the parties simply chose to side-step the slavery- expansion question (give no clear answer) so as to offend no one, hopefully. 3. In the election of 1848, Polk was ailing and would not run again. 1. The Democrats nominated Gen. Lewis Cass who'd spoken previously for popular sovereignty (the people of a territory should decide and issue for themselves). 2. The popular sovereignty position was well-liked by politicians since it enabled them to take a neutral stance and rather say, "Let the people decide." During the campaign, however, he kept rather silent on slavery. 2. Political Triumphs for General Taylor 1. The Whigs nominated Gen. Zachary Taylor in 1848. He had no political experience but was the "hero of Buena Vista" which went a long way—he won the election. 1. Taylor put the question of slavery expansion on the back burner and essentially had no official position on it. 2. Notable in 1848 was the Free Soil Party that emerged when many Northerners were upset that neither party took a position on the expansion of slavery. They nominated Martin Van Buren and their position was clearly against the expansion of slavery. 1. The Free Soilers also favored federal money for internal improvements and free land for settlers out west. 2. The party attracted a wide mix of people: (a) folks upset over getting only 1/2 of Oregon, (b) people who didn't want blacks in the new lands, and (c) northern abolitionists who didn't like slavery. 3. “Californy Gold” 1. At Sutter's Mill in 1848, gold was discovered. The secret was quickly out and California gold rush was on. 2. The next year, 1849, "Forty-Niners" flooded to California. Dreams of getting rich quick nearly always turned into either going bust or the constant hard work of moving dirt involved in mining. 1. Perhaps more people made their fortunes out of the myriad of things needed to accompany the miners: general stores, lumberyards, bars, barbershops, bakeries, opera-houses for entertainment, etc. 3. The overall result of the gold rush was that California had enough people to become a state, almost overnight. It applied to be a free state and thus threatened the 15-to-15 slave-to-free balance. 4. Sectional Balance and the Underground Railroad 1. By 1850, the South and slavery was on solid ground because (a) the president (Zachary Taylor) was a Virginia slave owner born/raised in Louisiana, (b) though outnumbered in the House, the South had equality in the Senate and could therefore block any unwanted laws, and (c) the Constitution favored the South (this would later be upheld in the Dred Scott case). 2. Even though on solid ground, the South felt they were under attack or upset over the following issues… 1. The proposition of California as a free state threatened the free/slave state balance. 2. Texas had a disputed region, again, this time into the New Mexico/Colorado/Wyoming area. 3. Northerners were pushing hard to abolish slavery in Washington D.C. 4. And most bothersome to the South was the issue of runaway slaves. The Fugitive Slave Law was supposed to "round up" runaways up North and ship them back South. This was largely not being done and the South took it as a personal offense. 1. 1. The Underground Railroad was a secret route from "station to station" that led many slaves to the North and eventually to Canada.Harriet Tubman was the most well-known "conductor" of the "railroad." She snuck back into the South 19 times and led some 300+ slaves to freedom. 3. With these hot issues heating up, political compromise was needed to avoid violent conflict. 5. Twilight of the Senatorial Giants 1. California's request to be a free state forced all of these issues onto the Congressional floor. 2. The 3 leading senators of the past decades had one more round of greatness in them… 1. Henry Clay was known as the "Great Compromiser" and offered a compromise here. He was notably seconded by a young Senator Stephen Douglas who will take a larger role in events later. Clay urged both sides to make concessions and to compromise. 2. For the South, John C. Calhoun argued for states' rights (the same argument as in the tariff crisis of the 1830's). He wanted slavery to be left alone, the runaway slaves to be returned to the South, and state balance kept intact. 3. For the North, Daniel Webster had been opposed to slavery's expansion. But, in his famous "Seventh of March" speech he urged the North to compromise on the issue. He felt that the lands of the Mexican Cession were too dry to grow cotton and therefore wouldn't need slavery anyway. 1. 1. Abolitionists, like poet Whittier, sharply criticized Webster as a traitor to the cause. 6. Deadlock and Danger on Capitol Hill 1. A "Young Guard" of politicians were emerging in Congress. They were more interested in purifying the nation than in preserving it. 2. Chief among the Young Guard was William H. Seward of NY. He was staunchly against slavery and argued that, when it came to slavery, Americans must follow a "higher law" (God's law), above the Constitution. 1. This moral high road may have cost Seward the presidency in 1860. 3. Pres. Zachary Taylor came under Seward influence. He appeared ready to veto any concessions on the matter. The chance for compromise seemed bleak. 7. Breaking the Congressional Logjam 1. Suddenly, Pres. Taylor died. Vice-President Millard Fillmore took over and was more open to compromise. 2. The Compromise of 1850 emerged. 1. Senate leaders Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and Stephen Douglas all urged the North to compromise. 2. Southern "fire-eaters" were still very much a against concession/compromise. Yet, calmer minds prevailed, the South went along, and the Compromise of 1850 passed. 8. Balancing the Compromise Scales This content copyright © 2010 by WikiNotes.wikidot.com 1. What the North got… 1. California admitted as a free state. This tipped the balance to the free side, permanently. 2. Texas gave up its claims to lands disputed with New Mexico. 3. The slave trade in District of Columbia was banned, but slavery was still legal. This was symbolic only. It was symbolic in that the nation’s capital “took a stance” against the trade. However, it was impractical because the trade only was illegal, not slavery, and since a person could easily buy a slave in next-door Virginia. 2. What the South got… 1. Popular sovereignty in the Mexican Cession lands. This was good for the South because prior to this, there was to be no new slave lands (the 36°30’ Missouri Compromise line had drawn that). On paper, this opened a lot of land to slavery, possibly. This was bad for the South because those lands were too dry to raise cotton anyway and therefore would never see slaves. 2. Texas was paid $10 million for the land lost to New Mexico. 3. A new, tougher Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 had read teeth in it. Details held that (a) runaway slaves weren't given "due process" rights if caught, (b) the official that handled the case received $5 for a slave's freedom but $10 for a slave's return, and (c) officials were demanded to catch runaway slaves despite their personal convictions on the matter. 1. 1. This Fugitive Slave Law proved to the be most
More Less

Related notes for AMH 2020

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit