Textbook Notes (373,216)
CA (164,571)
Queen's (4,018)
PSYC (1,118)
PSYC 241 (105)
Chapter 12

Chapter 12 Notes.docx

9 Pages
44 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 241
Professor
Roderick C L Lindsay

This preview shows pages 1-2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 9 pages of the document.
Description
Page 1 of9 Chapter 12: Law • Crime must be detected and reported. Through investigation, police find suspect and decide whether or not to make an arrest. • The suspect is jailed or bail is set, and judge or grand jury decides if there is sufficient evidence for a formal accusation. If there is, prosecuting and defense lawyers begin “discovery”, a lengthy process of gathering evidence; the defendant may plead guilty. • In cases that go to trial, after conviction the judge imposes a sentence, and the defendant decides whether to appeal to a higher court. For those in prison, decisions concerning release are made by parole boards. • The collection, presentation, and evaluation of evidence are imperfect human enterprises subject to bias – through an understanding of social psychology, we can identify some problems and their solutions. JURY SELECTION • Right to trial by impartial jury if accused of crime or involved in lawsuit in the U.S. 3 step process: o 1) Court uses voter registration lists, telephone directories, and other sources to compile master list of eligible citizens in community. o 2) People on the list are randomly drawn and summoned for duty, to achieve a representative sample. o 3) These people are subject to voir dire, the pretrial examination of prospective jurors by the judge or opposing lawyers to uncover signs of bias. E.g. if they know one of the parties, has an interest in the outcomes of the case, or has already formed an opinion. • In addition to de-selecting biased individual, lawyers can exercise peremptory challenges, where they reject a limited number of prospective jurors even without having to state reasons or with the judge’s approval. Trial Lawyers as Intuitive Psychologists • Trial lawyers often take an intuitive approach to jury selection, relying on implicit personality theories (assumptions about how attributes are related to each other and to behaviour) and stereotypes. • Most lawyers cannot effectively predict how jurors will vote, either by intuitive rules of thumb about gender, race, age, or other demographics, or by responses during the voir dire. • U.S. Supreme Court has limited use of peremptory challenges to prevent lawyers from systematically excluding prospective jurors based on race. • Just like most people, attorneys are influenced by conscious and unconscious racial stereotypes, and do not typically acknowledge them even when demonstrating racial biases. • Whether a juror characteristic predicts verdicts depends on the specifics of each case. Scientific Jury Selection • Use of jury consultants began during Vietnam War with trial of the Harrisburg Seven. Jay Schulman interviewed 840 residents of the local community. o Ideal defense juror: Female Democrat with no religious preference, and white-collar job. o Defense selected jury, resulting in 10 to 2 in favour of acquittal despite strong evidence o O.J. Simpson defense team also hired jury consultants, concluding that African American women would be strongest defenders – despite intuitive notions about their attitude towards his domestic violence. Page 2 of9 • Scientific Jury Selection: Method of selecting juries through surveys that yield correlations between demographics and trial-relevant attitudes. • Seek correlations through focus groups, mock juries, and community-wide surveys. Then, during voir dire ask prospective jurors about these background factors, using peremptory challenges to exclude those with profiles associated with unfavourable attitudes. • Does scientific jury selection tip scales in favour of wealthy clients able to afford the service, widening socioeconomic gap in court? Or is problem with legal system that allows peremptory challenges? Juries in Black and White: Does Race matter? • Kerr (1995): Tested hypothesis that jurors favour defendants similar to themselves, presenting mixed- race groups with a strong or weak case involving a black or white defendant. o When evidence was weak, subjects more lenient towards defendant of safe race – but harsher when the evidence was strong, to distance themselves. • Sommers and Ellsworth (2001): Tested hypothesis that jurors show preference of racial ingroup members when the crime involves race, like a motivated hate crime. o Opposite result: when race is a prominent issue, jurors deliberate try not to appear prejudiced, and do not discriminate. • Exhibition of racial bias depends on composition of jury that individual juror is part of. o Mock trial with black defendant, after voir dire that either did or did not make race a prominent issue. Juries formed were all black, all white, or heterogeneous. o For whites in diverse groups, 34% voted guilty compared to 51% in all-white groups. Death Qualification • Juror’s attitudes towards the death penalty composed of various beliefs: legitimacy of retribution and revenge, deterrence, and cost. Those who favour the death penalty are more likely to hold fundamentalist religious views, harbour authoritarian beliefs, and belief that people get what they deserve. • Death Qualification: Jury-selection procedure used in capital cases that permits judges to exclude prospective jurors who say they would not vote for the death penalty. • Are death-qualified juries prone to convict, tipping the balance of the verdict to the prosecution? o Yes, those who support the death penalty are more prosecution-minded about many issues, and are more likely to deliver a guilty verdict. o Even hearing death-qualification voir dire questions in itself is biasing – presume defendant’s guilt, communicating that court considers death a desirable form of punishment. • Supreme Court rejected research, ruling that death qualification does not violate a defendant’s right to a fair trial. • Many people who would be excluded for a general opposition to capital punishment would still consider it for a specific case, for those found guilty of atrocious acts of violence. THE COURTROOM DRAMA Confession Evidence • Central Park jogger case (1989): Despite confessions, 5 teenage boys did not rape the female jogger. A serial rapist, Matias Reyes, had committed the crime; this was confirmed by DNA testing. Police Interrogations: Social Influence under Pressure • Police must warn suspects about rights to silence and an attorney. Page 3 of 9 • Tactics of physical isolation in a small, bare, and soundproof room to arouse feelings of helplessness and discomfort. Nine-step procedure designed to extract confessions: o One approach to pressure suspect into submission by expressing certainty in their guilt, even claiming to have damaging evidence. The accused is led to believe it is futile to mount a defense. o 2 approach to befriend suspect, offer sympathy and advice, and minimizing the offense by offering face-saving excuses. The suspect is lulled into a false sense of security and caves, expecting leniency. The Risk of False Confessions • False confessions: When innocent people confess to crimes they did not commit. • Sometimes innocent people confess as an act of compliance, to escape of long periods of interrogation with fatigue, despair, and deprivation. Defendants may think that cooperation will lead to better outcomes. • Internalization: When innocent suspects believe themselves guilty of the crime. Factors that increase risk: o 1) When suspect lacks clear memory of event in question o 2) Presentation of false evidence o As well, people naturally vulnerable to suggestion more likely to be induced to internalize guilt o Internalization demonstrated by subject “admitting” guilt to a stranger (confederate) when alone • Tactics of promises of leniency and minimization of seriousness of violation increases number of true confessions among those who cheated in experiment. However, it also increases rate of false confessions. Confessions and the Jury: An Attributional Dilemma • Attribution dilemma when a suspect confesses, but then withdraws statement and pleads not guilty. If confession was clearly coerced, statement excluded; if not coerced, it is admitted into evidence to be evaluated. o Personal Attribution: Suspect statement indicates guilt. o Situational Attribution: Confession was to avoid unpleasant consequences of silence. • Fundamental attribution error of favouring personal attributions: would jurors view suspects as guilty even if they confessed under coercion? o Yes. 19% vote guilty without confession. Low-pressure confession: 62%; coerced-confession: 50%. o People are powerfully influenced by evidence f a confession, even when coerced and relayed information. • Most people, including police officers, cannot differentiate between true and false confessions. • To avoid effects of false confessions, new requirements of videotaping the full interrogation to enable judges and juries to see how confession came about, and the extent to which it was coerced. o Perception is influenced by camera perspective: when camera focuses on accused, people underestimate pressure of interrogator. Situation seen as more coercive when camera focused on interrogator. The Lie-Detector Test • Polygraph: Mechanical instrument that records signs of physiological arousal from multiple sensors that measure breathing, heart rate, and perspiration; it is often used as a lie-detector test. • Assumption that when people lie, they become anxious and aroused in measurable ways. One compares baseline level of arousal, then asks crime-relevant questions and control questions (arousing but crime-irrelevant). Page 4 of 9 • In theory, suspects who are innocent (truthful denial) should be more aroused by control questions, while guilty suspects (false denial) are more aroused by crime-relevant questions. • Under certain conditions (naïve suspect, competent examiner), polygraph can differentiate truth and deception relatively accurately. • Problems of truthful persons often failing the test, and possibility of faking results – using physical countermeasures to appear aroused on control questions to mask arousal on crime-relevant questions. • Judges may refuse to admit polygraph test results into evidence. Other tests: brain activity and oxygen levels in areas associated with deception, pupil dilation, etc. Eyewitness Testimony • Many instances of people convicted based on eyewitness accounts later proven innocent by DNA evidence. Eyewitness error is the most common cause of wrongful convictions. • 1) Eyewitnesses are imperfect. 2) Certain personal and situational factors can systematically influence their performance. 3) Judges, juries, and lawyers are not adequately informed about these factors. • Memory is a 3-stage process of acquisition, storage, and retrieval of information. Acquisition • Witness’s perceptions at time of event. Affected by exposure time, lighting, distance, disguises, and distraction. • Emotional state of high stress decreases accuracy of memory, e.g. bloody shooting, car wreck, assault. • Arousal induces witnesses to zoom in on the central features of an event – the culprit, victim, or weapon – while impairing memory for less central details. • Alcohol reduces accuracy of recall, especially making false identifications when perpetrator is absent. • Weapon-Focus Effect: Tendency of the presence of a weapon to draw attention and impair a witness’s ability to identify the culprit. o People are agitated by sight of menacing stimulus, and attention on weapon draws it away from the face. • Cross-Race Identification Bias: Tendency for people to have difficulty identifying members of a race other than their own. Finding that “they all look alike” is reliable across many different racial and ethnic groups. Storage • Memory for faces and events tend to decline with the passage of time. • Misinformation Effect: The tendency for false post-event misinformation to become integrated into people’s memory of an event. o Loftus and Palmer (1974): Subjects view film of traffic accident and asked about speed of collision – wording varied from “smashed” to “contacted”, and answered varied based on word use. o When subjects later called back, wording of questions had caused them to reconstruct their memories of the accident, such as about presence of broken glass. o Reports are biased, but unsure if real memory can still be retrieved intact. • Suggestive interview procedures can cause young children to give false testimony: case of Margaret Michaels, a preschool teacher accused of sex abuse. Child witnesses were asked leading questions, urged to describe acts they had denied, offered bribes, and pressured; there was no physical evidence or any other witnesses. • Are children too prone to confuse reality and fantasy, and thus unreliable? o Yes: Repetition, misinformation, and leading questions can bias memory report, especially for preschoolers. o Clear interviewing guidelines with objective questioning required. Page 5 of 9 Retrieval • Multiple memory retrievals when questioned by police and lawyers, view lineup or mug shots, assist in construction of facial composite, and testify. Each increases risk of error and distortion. • Facial composite seldom produces a face that resembles actual culprit, and process itself decreases identification accuracy due to confusion and difficulty. o On average, morphs from composites done by multiple eyewitnesses more similar to target than individual sketches. • Photographic or live lineup identifications often result in mistaken identity. Four factors affecting performance: • 1) Construction: Lineup should contain 4-8 innocent persons (“foils”) who match general description of culprit. Must also decrease any distinctive characters of suspect that increase chance of being selected. • 2) Instructions: Biased instructions indicating culprit was present in lineup lead witnesses to feel compelled to identify someone, often picking an innoc
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only pages 1-2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit