Textbook Notes (369,072)
Canada (162,367)
Psychology (3,337)
PSYC 2310 (266)
Chapter 13

PSYC 2310 Chapter 13 Notes.docx

8 Pages
168 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 2310
Professor
Jeffrey Yen

This preview shows pages 1,2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 8 pages of the document.
Description
Chapter 13 – Altruism and Prosocial Behaviour Prosocial behaviour – is any behaviour that has the goal of helping another person. Altruism – is helping without expectation of personal gain. Evolutionary Factors  People sometimes act in altruistic ways to help someone, even at a great personal cost.  This happens when such behaviour will help ensure the survival of their genes, which can then be passed on. Kinship selection – is the idea that we’re more likely to help those we are genetically related to.  Findings indicated that relationship factors, including emotional closeness and similarity, influence helping, in part because genetic factors lead to these relationship factors. In other words, we help those who are similar to us and emotionally close.  According to the reciprocal prosocial behaviour perspective, people help others to increase the odds that they, in turn, will be helped by those others.  Because helping others leads them to reciprocate, this type of cooperation among group members, regardless of their genetic connection, increases survival.  Men are more likely than women to help in situations that call for brave, heroic behaviour.  Men and women are more helpful in situations where helping is viewed as gender-role appropriate. Personality  It was found that agreeableness is the characteristic that predicts altruism. Kin altruism – is behaving in a way that benefits a genetic relative’s chances of survival or reproduction at some cost to one’s own chances.  Kin altruism is correlated negatively with emotional stability, whereas reciprocal altruism and emotional stability are correlated positively.  In general, people show an increase in empathy and prosocial behaviour as they mature. Empathy – is the ability to understand other people’s perspectives and respond emotionally to other people’s experiences.  People with higher levels of empathy engage in more prosocial behaviour, including donating money to charitable causes and spending time helping people in need. Moral reasoning – is a personality factor that describes the extent to which a person’s willingness to help depends on larger moral standards rather than the person’s needs and the expected consequences for him or her of helping.  The use of higher level reasoning is associated with greater empathy and altruism.  Parent who use positive behaviour, including positive feelings toward their child as well as positive discipline strategies; create more prosocial behaviour in their children over time. Religion  People who hold strong and conservative religious beliefs are very likely to help those who they believe deserve help, but not to help those whom they consider undeserving.  Religious fundamentalists are more likely to help some people, but less likely to help those whose behaviour contradicts behaviours that are acceptable to their religion. Decision-Making Process Model Decision-making process model – is a model that describes helping behaviour as a function of five distinct steps. 1. Emergencies are rare and unusual events, people don’t have a lot of experience in handling emergencies. 2. Emergencies themselves differ widely, even when people have direct experience in handling one type of emergency, they’re not likely to have experience in handling other types of emergencies, which all require different types of help. 3. Emergencies are unforeseen. Helping behaviour occurs only when a person takes five distinct steps – and if a person at any point fails to take a particular step, he or she will not provide aid: 1. Notice something is happening 2. Interpret it as an emergency Pluralistic ignorance – in the context of helping, it is the assumption that each person has that because others are not reacting, there is no emergency. 3. Take responsibility for providing help Diffusion of responsibility – is the belief that other people present in a situation will assume responsibility, which contributes to the bystander effect. Bystander effect – is a situation whereby people are less likely to help in emergency situations when there are other people present than if the person who could help is alone, resulting in a decreased likelihood of help being given.  As the number of potential helpers increases, the likelihood of help decreases.  People who believe that they’re the only one who could provide help to a person are more likely to help. 4. Decide how to help  People with relevant skills help more than people without such skills or training. 5. Provide help  This can be difficult because of audience inhibition. People can be reluctant to help because they might fear making a bad impression in front of others, either by appearing stupid or overly cautious. Arousal/Cost Reward Model Arousal/cost reward model – is a model that describes helping behaviour as caused in part by the physiological arousal that people experience when they see someone in need of help and in part by their calculation of the costs and rewards of providing such help. Example: if you hear a baby crying, you might be motivated to pick up the baby so that it will stop crying, not due to any particular concern for the child, but rather to avoid having to hear the unpleasant sobbing.  Individuals who experience shock and distress at watching something unpleasant may be motivated to help simply to reduce their own distress.  Even when people experience unpleasant arousal in response to seeing others in pain, they still compute the relative costs and benefits of helping before deciding to take action. Impact of Cost  Yes, the costs of helping influence altruistic behaviour.  Teaching someone about the personal costs of prosocial behaviour can lead to a decrease in helping. Impact of Benefits  The benefits or rewards of prosocial behaviour increase helping. That’s why parents give an allowance – to reward for helping around the house.  When a reward is given, it undermines children’s spontaneous helping.  Giving a reward leads children to attribute their altruistic behaviour to external, as opposed to internal, factors. Mood Good mood effect – is when people are in a good mood, they are more likely to help.  In fact, tipping is better on sunny days, presumably because we’re happier when the sun is shining.  People who are in good moods want to maintain them, and seeing someone else who is in need could destroy the mood  People who are in a good mood focus more on the positive aspects of situations, such as the benefits of helping, rather than the negative aspects.  People who are in a good mood experience increased self-awareness, which in turn leads us to try to match our behaviour to our internal values. Bad Moods  Bad moods can also increase the likelihood of prosocial behaviour.  Bad moods can increase helping because we have a desire to make up for whatever we did that caused this negative feeling.  Bad moods can also increase helping even when we aren’t trying to make up for our own wrongdoing. People who are asked to imagine the grief and worry that one of their close friends would experience if the friend was dying of cancer later help more.  When we have been socially excluded, we are less likely to help. Modelling  People can increase their altruistic behaviour when such behaviour is modelled for them by their parents, peers, or even media figures.  Seeing other people engage in helping behaviour gives us role models to follow, shows us the rewards of helping, and reminds us of the value of helping to society.  People who see moderately helpful models and are then asked to help may agree to the request but judge their motivation for such behaviour to be externally biased. Environmental Factors Urban overload hypothesis – is the hypothesis that people who live in urban areas are constantly exposed to stimulation, which in turn leads them to decrease their awareness of their environment.  People in small towns are more likely than those in urban areas to help others in a variety of small ways, including giving the time of day, participating in a survey, providing
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1,2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit