Textbook Notes (368,316)
Canada (161,798)
Psychology (3,337)
PSYC 2310 (266)
c (14)
Chapter 4

Chapter 4-Jan. 19th.docx

5 Pages
80 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2310
Professor
c
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 4- Social Perception January 19 2014 - Social Perception- how we form impressions of and make inferences about other people How do we think about why other people do what they do? - 4 major theories that describe how we think about why people engage in particular types of behaviour: 1. They theory of naïve psychology • Heider’s theory that people practice a form of untrained psychology as they use cause and effect analyses to understand their world and other people’s behaviour • Use casual theories to understand their world and other people’s behaviour • Based on three principles: 1. People have to need to explain the cause of other people’s behaviour in order to understand their motivation 2. People are motivated to try to figure out why a person acted in a given way so that they can predict how the person will act in the future 3. When people make causal attributions, they make a distinction between internal and external causes of behaviour o External attribution- seeing the behaviour as caused by something external to the person who performs the behaviour o Internal attribution- refers to whether the person’s behaviour is caused by personal factors, such as traits, ability, effort, or personality 2. Correspondent inference theory • The theory that people infer whether a person’s behaviour is caused by the person’s internal disposition by looking at various factors related to the person’s action • Predicts that people look at various factors related to a person’s actions to try to infer whether an action is caused by the person’s internal disposition 1. Does the person have the choice to engage in action? o If you know that the person was forced to engage in a given behaviour, its reasonable to assume that the action is due to the situation and not the person 2. Is the behaviour expected based on the social role or circumstance? o Behaviour that isn’t necessarily required, but is largely expected in a situation, doesn’t tell us much about the person 3. What are the intended effects or consequences of the person’s behaviour? o If there is only one intended effect, then you have a pretty good idea of why the person is motivated to engage in the behaviour • We are best able to make a dispositional attribution, and see people’s behaviour as caused by their traits, when the behaviour is freely chosen, is not a function of situational expectations, and has clear non-common effects 3. Covariation theory • The theory that people determine the causes of a person’s behaviour by focusing on the factors that are present when a behaviour occurs and absent when it doesn’t occur, with specific attention on the role of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency • Three main components: 1. Consensus- whether other people generally agree or disagree with a given person 2. Distinctiveness- whether the person generally reacts in a similar way across different situations 3. Consistency- information about whether a person’s behaviour toward a given stimulus is the same across time o If a person’s behaviour is highly consistent over time and across situations, we’re likely to make a dispositional attribution o If a given behaviour is unusual for a particular person, we’re likely to make a situational attribution • We make different attributions depending on the consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency of a person’s attitude and/or behaviour • If consensus and distinctiveness are low and consistency is high we make an internal or dispositional attribution • If consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency are all high, we make a situational attribution • If a person’s attitude or behaviour is low in consistency, we’re unable to make any attribution, whether dispositional or situational 4. Weiner’s attribution theory • Based on the assumption that people want to maintain a positive self-image • People attribute their achievements in terms of three dimensions: 1. Locus- whether the location of the cause is internal or external to the person 2. Stability- whether the cause stays the same or can change 3. Controllability- whether the person can control the cause • This produces eight different types of explanation for achievement • People often tend to attribute their own success to internal factors and others’success to external factors • People attribute their own failure to external factors and others’ failure to internal factors - Intergroup attribution- making attributions about one’s own and others’
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2310

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit