GMGT 3300 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1: Ratio Decidendi
Document Summary
Facts same facts as in a, however different reasons. Judge in court of appeal says i find in favour of a, b/c thief takes not title. Person a took reasonable care of the diamonds, had he been careless, then i would allow a good faith purchaser for value to keep them. the ratio is not clear it"s ambiguous 3. Sometimes lawyers think they have found a ratio that they think will fit; however, the judge may do something called narrowing the ratio (distinguishing the facts). Facts person a sells diamonds to person b. Person b sells the diamonds to percon c who is a good faith purchaser. A sues diamonds from c b/c b paid with a cheque that. Saskatchewan court of appeal (skca) manitoba court of appeal (mbca)