Textbook Notes (375,992)
CA (165,774)
UTSC (18,827)
Psychology (9,860)
PSYB32H3 (1,181)


9 Pages

Course Code
Mark Schmuckler

This preview shows pages 1-2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 9 pages of the document.

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Psyb20-ch 12 How peer interactions begin developmental patterns Infancy: first social encounters -first 6 months they touch and look at each other and as responsive to each other’s behavior -second half of life infants begin to recognize a per as a social partner -show the ability to interact in groups and to be involved with more than one person at the same time -they develop competence in interacting with peers, they shift toward increased social play and exhibit a clear preference for playing with peers rather than adults -mothers tend to bear the larger responsibility for maintaining the interaction, whereas in exchanges between infants and peers, the 2 partners contribute more equally Social exchange among toddlers -when children engage in positive social interactions they are more likely to smile or laugh or display other kinds of appropriate positive affect and their interactions lasts longer -the complexity of toddle play increases over age p.469 table 12-1 -solitary play and parallele play diminish as the child grows older and associative and cooperative play both increase in frequency as well as some 4 yr olds are still engaging in solitary play, while some precocious 2.5 yr olds are busily in cooperative play bouts -negative exchanges and conflict increase as well -toddlers who frequently initiate conflicts with peers were also the most sociable and the most likely to initiate interactions -relationship: two ppl share an ongoing succession of interactions that continues over time and affects each other -both their history of past interactions and their expectations of future interactions influence the nature and course of events -children between ages of 1 and 2 develop preferences for particular playmates -early social choices of special friends are not temporary, most last over a year, and they are not just limited to dyads Preschool and elementary school society -over time children spend more hours with child companions and fewer with adults -at adolescence spend less time with family more with friends, mostly in US compared to east -age 3-4 children choose same and opposite sex companions, but after they prefer same sex companions (girls have cooties), adolescence is cross gender How do peers help to socialize children -peers offer a perspective quite different from the fams -peers can influence through reinforcement modeling social comparison and provding opp for learning and socializing Modeling behaviors -children acquire knowledge behaviors simply by observing the behavior and actions of their peers children also imitate older more powerful peer models -imitation can be an important way of maintaining social interaction -it leads to more sophisticated forms of play in social games and to the generation of verbal communication Teaching and reinforcing -reinforce is to pay attention to another’s behavior to praise or criticize it or share in it -peer pressure implies adolescent peers convivnce their compatriots to take risks and engage in deviant behavior -reciprocity begins to grow as nursery schoolers reinforce the same peers who reinforced them -peers differential reinforcement can produce significant changes in target child’s behavior -children respond respond to negative reinforcement too -peers can quickly whip a child into place just with looks, or offering bitting comments or ostracizing the child from the group eX: looks criticize clothes -children teach each other and acquire new skills together and in some cultures both older peers and siblings teach and are caregivers for younger children Social comparison and the developing self -social comparison: children watch and talk with their peers and then use what they have learned to evaluate themselves -early elementary school years, children display a marked increase in their use of social comparison with the peer group as a means of self evaluation -child’s self image and self acceptance are closely associated with how she is received by her peers -if you think you are as good as you peers, your self esteem is high -you evaluate yourself based on interaction with peers, ex: im a good figher cuz I beat a lot of people up Peer acceptance -interacting with peers is the child’s first experience of social behavior beyond the family How do we study peer acceptance? -sociometric techniques in which they ask children to rate peers on scales of aggressiveness of helpfulness or to compare peers as to likeability or to indentity those whom they like best -they ask peers because because they see a wider range of relevant behaviors than do adults, they aslso have extended and varied experience with each other, by gathering data from many individuals who have interacted with the child who is the subject of study, we prevent any single individuals view from dominating our result -nomination technique: investigator asks each child in a group to name a specific number of peers who they likes and do not like -popular children: positive nominations, friendly and assertive but not disruptive or aggressive, good at communication help set the rules and norms for their groups engage in more prosocial behavior -average children: both types of nominations, neither as well liked or disliked -neglected children: isolated, friendless not necessarily disliked by their classmates, receive few like or dislike votes, aggressive, less talkative more withdrawn -controversial children: positive nominations but also a lot of negative ones -rejected children: negative nominations, - aggressive rejected children: aggressiveness and poor self control behavioral problems, but self perceptions are not poor -non aggressive rejected children: anxious, withdrawn and socially unskilled perceive themselves as less competent Fators that affect peer status -childs cognitive and social skills, ability to initiate interactions with others to communicate effectively and interact comfortably with them -people meet others, likely to base their initial appraisals of the person on superficial characteristics Acquiring social cognitive skills -child who asks new acquaintances for info offers info are on the way to acceptation -need to feel confident and be interested in learning what others in the group are like Processing and acting on social info -child approaching the new group of peers needs to understand other’s communications clearly and interpret their behavior -make useful decisions to communicate clearly to others -model stresses the cognitive steps in evaluating problems that a child confronts when interacting with others, remember that individual biological predispositions also play a role in accounting for variations in the decision making process Check figure 12-3 447 for steps -these steps can be altered based on child competencies -children of various levels of competence would respond differently -the imcompetent children were less likely to notice and interpret the cues correctly -children who understood what to do were better at the real task of gaining entry into the peer group -deficits in social understanding can lead to poor social relationships -rejected children tend to view others in hostile terms and to make hostile attributions about other peers intentions -not all children have the same goals and strategies in social situations and to have the ability to devise a few strategies to achieve these goals -certain kinds of social goals tend to be accompanied by certain kinds of strategies eX: we want to be bossy we use ways to achieve that -children differ in the way they perceive themselves and in the way they explain y they are sometimes successful at a task and sometimes unsuccessful ex: you see yourself positive youll form more positive bonds -one way to circumvent the latter kind of thinking is to prevent the child from seeein a task or problem as a measure of her ability and instead focus the childs attention on just trying out something new and possibly useful -the children given the learning goal were more persistent and ultimately more successful than children given the performance goal -bandura’s social self efficacy theory -maladaptive behavior over time can lead to the development of social info processing deficits -experience of early peer rejection, by limiting a childs ability to acquire necessary social experience leads to greater cognitive deficits which in turn contribute to maladaptive behavior and less acceptance by peers Beauty may be only skin deep but it’s way cool -children are just as likely as adults to base their impressions on the person’s physical appearance -tend to attribute positive qualities to those who are physically attractive ex: think they find good qualities in good looking people compared to unattractive -attractive are judged more positively, you get treated better if your attractive -found attractive children were more popular better adjusted and even displayed greater intelligence We like to have boys girls -up to the age of 7 children are usually willing to play with peers of either gender but even In preschool years, gender discrimination can occur -not until early adolescence that children once again choose opposite gender companions -with cross gender play it can expand their pool of potential friends and promote a better understanding of the qualities that are shared by both sexes -children whose primary friendships were with opposite sex peers were less well accepted judges less skilled academically and socially and tended to report lower self esteem -important not to exaggerate the differences in peer relationships styles of both boys and girls -boys and girls participate in both cooperative and competitive activites -girls can be aggressive show it differently than boys What’s in a name or an age -children are more likely to be friendly with people whose names are familiar -north American children spend most of their time with same age peers -in many other cultures older children often play with younger ones as well as care and teach them -children expect to play with agemates and younger peers and to get help from older peers -children share interest mo
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only pages 1-2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.